Comparison of three types of white powder suspensions for the recovery of fingerprints on wetted nonporous surfaces

Journal of Forensic Identification

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 590-599

  Daéid, Niamh Nic ^a   Carter, Stephanie ^a   Laing, Kenny ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b Scottish Police Services Authority Forensic Services   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FINGER DERMATOGLYPHICS; POROSITY; POWDER; STAINING; SURFACE PROPERTY; SUSPENSION;

EID: 51149121874     PISSN: 0895173X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Lee, H. C.; Gaensslen, R. E. Advances in Fingerprint Technology, 2nd ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2001; pp 113-115.
2. Champod, C.; Lennard, C.; Margot, P.; Stoilovic, M. Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2004.
3. Frank, A.; Almog, J. Modified SPR for Latent Fingerprint Development on Wet, Dark Objects. J. For. Ident. 1993, 43 (3), 240-244.
4. 2). J. For. Ident. 2002, 52 (5), 551-559.
5. White Powder Suspension for Adhesive Tapes. HOSDB Fingerprint and Footwear For. News. October 2006, Pub. 58/06, 6-7.
6. Current Programme of Work. HOSDB Fingerprint Development and Imaging News. October 2005, No. 47/05, p 2.