Ethical and legal considerations regarding disputed authorship with the use of shared data

Accountability in Research

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 105-131

  Welsh, Robert K ^a,b   Lareau, Craig R ^b   Clevenger, Jeanne K ^a   Reger, Mark A ^c,d  

^a AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PATTON STATE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; COOPERATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; COPYRIGHT; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FACULTY; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 51149102707     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989620801946925     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Psychological Association (APA). (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, American Psychologist, 47: 1597-1611.
2. American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved March 28, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html.
3. Brown-Wright, D. A., Dubick, D. A., and Newman, I. (1997). Graduate assistant expectation and faculty perception: Implications for mentoring and training, Journal of College Student Development, 38: 410-415.
4. Costa, M. M., and Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations, Psychological Science, 3(6): 354.
5. Crespi, T. D. (1994). Student scholarship: In the best interest of the scholar, American Psychologist, 49(12): 1094-1095.
6. Fields, K. L., and Price, A. R. (1993). Problems in research integrity arising from misconceptions about the ownership of research, Academic Medicine, 68(9): 60-64.
7. Fine, M. A., and Kurdeck, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations, American Psychologist, 48: 1141-1147.
8. Fisher, C. B. (2003). Decoding the Ethics Code: A PracticalGguide for Psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2006). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved March 28, 2006, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Web site: http://www.icmje.org/icmje.pdf.
10. Jones, K. D. (1999). Ethics in publication, Counseling and Values, 43(2): 99-105.
11. Louw, D. A., and Fouche, J. B. (1999). Authorship credit in supervisor-student collaboration: Assessing the dilemma in psychology, South African Journal of Psychology, 29(3): 145-148.
12. Marshall, E. (1993). MSU officials criticized for mishandling data dispute, Scientific Misconduct, 259: 592-594.
13. McGue, M. (2000). Authorship and intellectual property. In B. D. Sales, and S. Folkman, (Eds.), Ethics in Research with Human Participants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Roberts, G. T., Murrel, P. T., Thomas, R. E., and Claxton, C. S. (1982). Ethical concerns for counselor educators, Counselor Education and Supervision, 22(1): 8-14.
15. Sales, B., and Folkman, S. (2000) Ethics inRresearch with Human Participants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Sieber, J. E. (1994) Will the new code help researchers to be more ethical? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25(4): 369-375.
17. Steneck, N. H. (2004). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Retrieved March 28, 2006, from Office of Research Integrity: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site: http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/rcrintro.pdf.
18. Sullivan, L. E., and Ogloff, J. R. (1998). Appropriate supervisor-graduate student relationships, Ethics and Behavior, 8(3): 229-248.
19. Uchiyama, K., and Simone, G. (1999). Publishing educational research: Guidelines and tips. Retrieved November, 9, 2004, from American Educational Research Association Web site: http://www.aera.net/epubs.
20. Wettstein, R. M. (2001). Authorship is broken, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29: 270-273.