E-government and NPM: A perfect marriage?

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 60, Issue , 2004, Pages 547-555

  Homburg, Vincent ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

e government; new public management; virtual organizations

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; E-GOVERNMENT; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS; MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS; NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; PUBLIC SECTOR; REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURES; UNDERPERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL ORGANIZATION;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 51149095251     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1052220.1052289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. 1992, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Behn, R.D., Rethinking Democratic Accountability. 2001, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institute.
3. Hood, C., A Public Management For All Seasons? Public Administration, 1991. 69(1): p. 3-19.
4. Pollitt, C.P., Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of the impacts of public management reform. Public Management, 2000. 2(2): p. 181-199.
5. Fountain, J., Building the Virtual State. 2001, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.
6. Fountain, J., A Theory of Federal Bureaucracy, in Governance.com. Democracy in the information age., J. Nye and E. Kamarck, Editors. 2002, The Brookings Institute: Washington DC.
7. Symonds, M., The next revolution. The Economist, 2000. 355(8176).
8. Bellamy, C. and J. Taylor, Governing in the Information Age. 1998, Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Heeks, R., Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform. 2001, London: Routledge.
10. van Duivenboden, H.P.M. and A.M.B. Lips. Taking Citizens Seriously. in EGPA. 2001. Vaasa.
11. Dunleavy, P. and H. Margetts. The Advent of Digital Government: Public Bureaucracies and the State in The Information Age. in Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association. 2000. Washington.
12. Pollitt, C.P. and G. Bouckaert, Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Chadwick, A. and C. May, Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "e-government" in the United States, Britain and the European Union. Governance, 2003. 16(2): p. 271-300.
14. Wilson, W., The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 1887. 2(2): p. 206.
15. Guy Peters, B., The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. 1996, Kansas: Kansas University Press.
16. Groth, L., Future Organizational Design, in Future Organizational Design, L. Groth, Editor. 1999, John Wiley & Sons: Chicester. p. 325-344.
17. Bovens, M. and S. Zouridis, From street-level bureaucracy to system-level bureaucracy: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 2002. 62(2): p. 174-184.
18. Gruening, G., Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 2001. 4(1): p. 1-25.
19. Hammer, M., Don't Automate, Obliterate! Harvard Business Review, 1990. 68(4): p. 104-113.
20. Peters, T.J. and R.H. Waterman, In Search of Excellence. 1982, New York: Harper and Row.
21. Osborne, D., Bureaucracy Unbound, in Washington Post Magazine. 1996: Washington. p. 8.
22. Behn, R.D., The New Public Management Paradigm and the Search for Government Accountability. International Public Management Journal, 1998. 1(2): p. 131-164.
23. Hirschman, A., Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States. 1970, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24. Hood, C., Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. International Public Management Journal, 2000. 3(1): p. 1-22.
25. Lynn, L.E., A Critical Analysis of The New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 1998. 1(1): p. 107-123.
26. Landsbergen, D. and G. Walken, Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology. Public Administration Review, 2001. 61(2): p. 206-219.
27. Homburg, V.M.F., The Political Economy of Information Management. 1999, Groningen: SOM.
28. Homburg, V.M.F., The Politics and Property Rights of Information Exchange. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 2001. 13(3): p. 49-66.
29. Box, R.C., Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. 1998, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
30. Vigoda, E. and R.T. Golembiewski, Citizenship Behavior and the Spirit of New Managerialism: A Theoretical Framework and Challenge for Governance. American Review of Public Administration, 2001. 31(3): p. 273-295.
31. Gascó, M., New Technologies and Institutional Change in Public Administration. Social Science Computer Review, 2003. 21(1): p. 6-14.
32. Fletcher, P.T., et al., Managing Information Technology: Transforming County Governments in the 1990s. 1992, Syracuse: School of Information Studies.
33. Kraemer, K.L. and J.L. King, Computers and Local Government. 1977, New York: Praeger.
34. Nohria, N. and J.D. Berkley, The virtual organization (Bureaucracy, technology and the implosion of control), in The post-bureaucratic organization., C. Heckscher and A. Dennelon, Editors. 1994, Sage: Thousand Oaks. p. 108-128.
35. Bendix, R., Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. 1960, CA: University of California Press.
36. Gazendam, H.W.M., Variety Controls Variety. On the Use of Organization Theories in Information Management. 1993, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
37. Edmiston, K.D., State and Local E-Government. American Review of Public Administration, 2003. 33(1): p. 20-45.
38. Moon, M.J., The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 2002. 62(4): p. 424-433.
39. National Audit Office, Better Public Services through e-government. 2002, National Audit Office: London.