A plug-and-play model for evaluating wavefront computations on parallel architectures

IPDPS Miami 2008 - Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Program and CD-ROM

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Mudalige, Gihan R ^a   Vernon, Mary K ^b   Jarvis, Stephen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATIONS; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; WAVEFRONTS;

PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 51049124075     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2008.4536243     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. A. Hoisie, H. Lubeck, and H.J. Wasserman. Performance and Scalability Analysis of Teraflop-Scale Parallel Architectures using Multidimensional Wavefront Applications. Int. J of High Performance Computing Applications, 14(4):330-346, Winter,2000.
2. The message passing interface (mpi). http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/mpi/.
3. D. Sundaram-Stukel and M. K. Vernon. Predictive Analysis of a Wavefront Application Using LogGP. In PbPoPP '99: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGPIAN symposium on Principles and practice ofparallelprogramming, pages 141-150. ACM Press, 1999.
4. D.J. Kerbyson, A. Hoisie, and H.J.Wasserman. A Comparison Between the Earth simulator and Alphaserver Systems using Predictive Application Performance Models. Computer Architecture News (ACM), December 2002.
5. A. Hoisie, O. Lubeck, H. J. Wasserman, F. Petrini, and H. Alme. A General Predictive Performance Model for Wavefront Algorithms on Clusters of SMPs. In ICPP '00: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Parallel Processing, page 219. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
6. M. M. Mathis, N. M. Amato, and M. L. Adams. A General Performance Model for Parallel Sweeps on Orthogonal Grids for Particle Transport Calculations. Technical report, Texas A&M University, 2000.
7. M. Yarrow and R. Van der Wijngaart. Communication improvement for the LU NAS parallel benchmark: A model for efficient parallel relaxation schemes. Technical Report NAS- 97-032, NASA Ames Research Center, November 1997.
8. A. Hoisie, G. Johnson, D. J. Kerbyson, M. Lang, and S. Pakin. A performance comparison through benchmarking and modeling of three leading supercomputers: blue gene/I, red storm, and purple. In SC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, page 74, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
9. A. Alexandrov, M. F. Ionescu, K. E. Schauser, and C. Scheiman. LogGP: Incorporating Long Messages into the LogP Model for Parallel Computation. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 44(1):71-79, 1997.
10. Cray XT4 data sheet. http://www.cray.com/products/xti4.