Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using spectral clustering with textural and architectural image features

2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Proceedings, ISBI

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 496-499

  Doyle, Scott ^a   Agner, Shannon ^a   Madabhushi, Anant ^a   Feldman, Michael ^b   Tomaszewski, John ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated grading; Breast cancer; Histopathology; Image analysis

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER NETWORKS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; ROUGH SET THEORY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

AUTOMATED GRADING; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCERS; HISTOPATHOLOGY;

FLOW OF SOLIDS;

EID: 51049109414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541041     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. H. J. Bloom andW.W. Richardson, "Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years.," Br J Cancer, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 359-377, Sep 1957.
2. L. W. Dalton et al., "Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.," Mod Pathol, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 730-735, Jul 2000.
3. J. S. Meyer et al., "Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by bloom-richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.," Mod Pathol, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1067-1078, Aug 2005.
4. G. Contesso et al., "The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the institut gustave-roussy.," J Clin Oncol, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1378-1386, Sep 1987.
5. R. F. Brem et al., "Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial.," AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 687-693, Sep 2003.
6. B. Weyn et al., "Automated breast tumor diagnosis and grading based on wavelet chromatin texture description.," Cytometry, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 32-40, Sep 1998.
7. S. Petushi et al., "Large-scale computations on histology images reveal gradedifferentiating parameters for breast cancer.," BMC Med Img, vol. 6, pp. 14, 2006.
8. D.E. Axelrod et al., "Effect of quantitative nuclear image features on recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis) of the breast," Cancer Informatics, vol. 4, pp. 99-109, 2008.
9. A. Tözeren and B. Kara̧cali, "Automated detection of regions of interest for tissue microarray experiments: An image texture analysis," BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 7, 2007.
10. S. Doyle A. Madabhushi et al., "Automated grading of prostate cancer using architectural and textural image features," in ISBI 2007, 2007, pp. 1284-1287.
11. A. Madabhushi et al., "Graph embedding to improve supervised classification and novel class detection: application to prostate cancer.," MICCAI, vol. 8, no. Pt 1, pp. 729-737, 2005.
12. R M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein, "Textural features for image classification," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 610-621, Nov. 1973.
13. J. Sudbø, R. Marcelpoil, and A. Reith, "New algorithms based on the voronoi diagram applied in a pilot study on normal mucosa and carcinomas.," Anal Cell Pathol, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 71-86, 2000.