Probability-based seismic assessment of buildings, considering post-earthquake safety

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 667-699

  Maffei, Joe ^a   Telleen, Karl ^a   Nakayama, Yuki ^b  

^a Rutherford and Chekene   (United States)

^b KAJIMA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROBABILITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE SAFETY; MODELING STRENGTH; NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC EVALUATION; STANFORD UNIVERSITY; STRENGTH DEGRADATION; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GUIDELINE; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; PROBABILITY; SAFETY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 51049105501     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2950066     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2007. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Report No. ASCE/SEI 41-06.
2. Anderson, J., 1995. Post earthquake studies of a damaged low rise office building, Case Studies of Steel Moment Frame Building Performance in the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994 Technical Report No. SAC 95-07, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA, December.
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1987. Evaluating the Seismic Resistance of Existing Buildings, Report No. ATC-14, Redwood City, CA.
4. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1989. Procedures for Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Report No. ATC-20, Redwood City, CA.
5. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1995. Addendum to the ATC-20 Procedures for Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, Report No. ATC-20-2, Redwood City, CA.
6. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1997. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared by the Applied Technology Council (ATC-33 project) for the Building Seismic Safety Council, funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA 273, Washington D.C.
7. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1999a. Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, Basic Procedures Manual, prepared by the Applied Technology Council (ATC-43 project) for the Partnership for Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA 306, Washington D.C.
8. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1999b. Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, Technical Resources, prepared by the Applied Technology Council (ATC-43 project) for the Partnership for Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA 307, Washington D.C.
9. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1999c. Repair of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, prepared by the Applied Technology Council (ATC-43 project) for the Partnership for Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA 308, Washington D.C.
10. Barda, F., Hanson, J. W, and Corley, W. G., 1976. Shear strength of low-rise walls with boundary elements, research and development bulletin RD043.01D, preprinted with permission from ACI Symposium Reinforced Concrete Structures in Seismic Zones, American Concrete Institute, by Portland Cement Association.
11. Bazzurro, P., Cornell, C. A., Menun, C., Luco, N., and Motahari, M., 2004. Advanced Seismic Assessment Guidelines, prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Berkeley, CA, September.
12. Bonowitz, D., and Zimmerman, L., 2008. SAC Steel Database, SAC Steel Project, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, CA. Retrieved June 2008. http://www.sacsteel.org/connections.
13. Federation Internationale du Béton (FIB), 2003a. Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, State of the Art Report prepared by Task Group 7.1, Lausanne, Switzerland, May.
14. Fédération Internationale du Béton (FIB), 2003b. Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures, State-of-the-Art Report prepared by Task Group 7.3, Lausanne, Switzerland, October.
15. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report No. FEMA 356, Washington D.C.
16. Luco, N., Bazzurro, P., and Cornell, C. A., 2004. Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-darnaged building to withstand an aftershock, Proceedings of the l3th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B. C., Canada, August.
17. MacRae, G. A., 1994. P-A Δ effects on single-degree-of-freedom structures in earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra 10, 539-568.
18. Maffei, J., 2000. Suggested improvements to performance-based seismic guidelines, Proceedings of the l2th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January.
19. Maffei, J., Telleen, K., Mohr, D., Holmes, W., and Nakayama, Y, 2006. Test Applications of Advanced Seismic Assessment Guidelines, Report No. PEER 2005/09, prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Berkeley, CA, August.
20. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE), 2006. Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquakes, Wellington, New Zealand, June.
21. Park, R., 1997. A static force-based procedure for the seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete moment resisting frames, New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. Bull 30, 213-226.
22. Park, R., and Paulay, T., 1975. Reinforced Concrete Structures, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York.
23. R&C and SGH, 2004. Seismic Assessment of the Building Located at III Almaden Street, San Jose, California, prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Rutherford & Chekene Consulting Engineers, Oakland, CA, August.
24. Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A., 2002. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through incremental dynamic analysis, Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, July.