Glenoid fossa position in class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 808-812

  Giuntini, Veronica ^a   De Toffol, Laura ^b   Franchi, Lorenzo ^a   Baccetti, Tiziano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Class II malocclusion; Glenoid fossa; Mandibular retrusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949128464     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/073007-353.1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Moyers R. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago-London-Boca Raton: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc; 1988:183-195.
2. Hopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA. The cranial base as an etiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:250-255.
3. Droel R, Isaacson RJ. Some relationships between the glenoid fossa position and various skeletal discrepancies. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:64-78.
4. Baccetti T, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tonti M, Tollaro I. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:55-59.
5. Boman VR. Research studies on the temporomandibular joint: their interpretation and application to clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1952;22:154-164.
6. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodelling. Am J Orthod. 1987;92:181-198.
7. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment: a clinical and MRI study. Am J Orthod. 1998;114:475-483.
8. Katsavrias EG. The effect of mandibular protrusive (activator) appliances on articular eminence morphology. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:647-653.
9. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:657-668.
10. Björk A. Cranial base development. Am J Orthod. 1955;41:198-225.
11. Anderson D, Popovich F. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 1989;59:37-42.
12. Kerr WJ, Adams CP. Cranial base and jaw relationship. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1988;77:213-220.
13. Bacon W, Eiller V, Hildwein M, Dubois G. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:224-228.
14. Reyes BC, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. An estimate of craniofacial growth in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:577-584.
15. KantomaaT. The relation between mandibular configuration and the shape of the glenoid fossa in the human. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:77-81.
16. Bathia SN, Leighton BC. A Manual of Facial Growth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993: 12, 13, 82, 245, 246, 310, 376.
17. Keeling SD, King GJ, Wheeler TT, McGovray S. Timing of Class II treatment: rationale, methods and early results of an ongoing randomized clinical trial. In: McNamara JA Jr, ed. Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome and Effectiveness. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1995:81-112.
18. Jacobson A. Application of the "Wits" appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:179-189.
19. Wylie WL. The assessment of anteroposterior dysplasia. Angle Orthod. 1947;17:97-109.
20. Graber TM. Functional analysis. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic GA. Dentofacial Orthopedics With Functional Appliances. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1997:129-131.