Multi-environment trial analysis for Pinus radiata

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 143-159

  Ding, M ^a   Tier, B ^a   Dutkowski, G W ^b   Wu, Harry X ^c   Powell, M B ^d   McRae, T A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

^d Southern Tree Breeding Association   (Australia)

Author keywords

GxE interaction; Log likelihood; Pinus radiata

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY;

ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATIONS; GENETIC CORRELATION; GXE INTERACTION; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS; LOG LIKELIHOOD; PINUS RADIATA; RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; VARIANCE COMPONENTS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; ERROR ANALYSIS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MODELING; TREE;

PINUS RADIATA;

EID: 50949120488     PISSN: 00480134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. BAKER, R.J. 1988: Analysis of genotype-environmental interactions in crops. ISI Atlas of Science: Animal and Plant Sciences 1: 1-4.
2. CARSON, S. D. 1991: Genotype x environment interaction and optimal number of progeny test sites for improving Pinus radiata in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 21: 32-49.
3. CASANOVES, F.; MACCHIAVELLI, R.; BALZARINI, M. 2005: Error variation in multienvironment peanut trials: within-trial spatial correlation and between-trial heterogeneity. Crop Science 45: 1927-1933.
4. COSTAESILVA, J.; DUTKOWSKI, G.W.; GILMOUR, A.R. 2001: Analysis of early tree height in forest genetic trials is enhanced by including a spatially correlated residual. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 1887-1893.
5. CULLIS, B.R.; GOGEL, B.J.; VERBYLA, A.P.; THOMPSON, R. 1998: Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation trials. Biometrics 54: 1-18.
6. DELACY, I.H.; COOPER, M.; BASFORD, P.K. 1996: Relationships among analytic methods used to study genotype-by-environment interactions and evaluation of their impact on response to selection. Pp. 51-84 in Kang, M.S.; Gauch, H.G. (Ed.) "Genotype-by-Environment Interaction: New Perspectives". CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
7. DELACY, I.H.; BASFORD, K.E.; COOPER, M.; BULL, J.K.; MCLAREN, C.G. 1996: Analysis of multi-environment trials - an historical perspective. In Cooper, M.; Hammer, G.L. (Ed.) "Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement". CAB INTERNATIONAL, Cambridge.
8. DUTKOWSKI, G.W.; COSTAE SILVA, J.; GILMOUR, A.R.; LOPEZ, G.A. 2002: Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 2201-2214.
9. DUTKOWSKI, G.W.; COSTA E SILVA, J.; GILMOUR, A.R.; WELLENDORF, H.; AGUIAR, A. 2006: Spatial analysis enhances modeling of a wide variety of traits in forest genetic trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1851-1870.
10. EISEN, E.J.; SAXTON, A.M. 1983: Genotype by environment interactions and genetic correlation involving two environmental factors. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 67: 75-86.
11. FRENSHAM, A.B.; CULLIS, B.R.; VERBYLA, A.P. 1997: Genotype by environment variance heterogeneity in a two-stage analysis. Biometrics 53: 1373-1383.
12. FU Y.B.; YANCHUK, A.D.; NAMKOONG, G. 1999: Spatial patterns of tree height variations in a series of Douglas-fir progeny trials: implications for genetic testing. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 714-723.
13. GILMOUR, A.R.; CULLIS, B.R.; WIELHAM, S.J.; THOMSON, R. 1999: ASREML reference manual. NSW Agriculture Biometric Bulletin 3.
14. HAAPANEN, M. 1996: Impact of family-by-trial interaction on the utility of progeny testing methods for Scots Pine. Silvae Genetica 45: 130-135.
15. HAMANN, A.; KOSHY, M.P.; NAMKOONG, G. 2002: Improving precision of breeding values by removing spatially auto-correlated variation in forestry field experiments. Silvae Genetica 51: 210-215.
16. HAMMER G.L.; COOPER, M. 1996: "Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement". CAB INTERNATIONAL, Wallingford.
17. HENDERSON, C.R. 1984: Application of linear models in animal breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69-83
18. JOHNSON, G.R.; BURDON, R.D. 1990: Family-site interactions in Pinus radiata: Implications for progeny testing strategy and regionalized breeding in New Zealand. Silvae Genetica 39: 55-62.
19. KANG, M.S. 2004: Breeding: genotype-by-environment interaction. Pp. 218-221 in Goodman, R.M. (Ed.) "Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science". New York, Basel.
20. KANZLER, A. 2002: "Genotype x Environment Interaction in Pinus patula and its Implications in South Africa". North Carolina State University, USA.
21. KENDALL, M.G.; STUART, A. 1979: "The Advantage Theory of Statistics. Vol. 2. Inference and Relationship". Griffin and Co., London.
22. MAGNUSSEN, S. 1990: Application and comparison of spatial models in analyzing tree-genetics field trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20.
23. MATHESON, A.C.; RAYMOND, C.A. 1984: The impact of genotype x environment interactions on Australian Pinus radiata breeding programs. Australian Forest Research 14: 11-25.
24. MUIR, W.; NYQUIST, W.E.; XU, S. 1992: Alternative partitioning of the genotype-by-environment interaction. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 84: 193-200.
25. NYQUIST, W.E. 1991: Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 10: 235-322.
26. PATTERSON, H.; NABUGOOMU, F. 1992: REML and the analysis of series of crop variety trials. Pp. 77-93 in "Proceedings from the 16th International Biometric Conference", Hamilton, New Zealand.
27. PATTERSON, H.D.; THOMPSON, R. 1971: Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.
28. PEDERICK, L.A. 1990: Family x site interactions Pinus radiata in Victoria, Australia, and implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genetica 39: 134-140.
29. ROBERTSON, A. 1959: The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15: 469-485.
30. SEARLE, S.R.; GASELLA, G.; McCULLOCH, C.E. 1992: "Variance Components". John Wiley & Sons, New York.
31. SMITH, A.; CULLIS, B.; THOMPSON, R. 2001: Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57: 1138-1147.
32. SMITH, A.; CULLIS, B.; THOMPSON, R. 2005: The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. Journal of Agricultural Science 143: 1-14.
33. WU, H.X.; MATHESON, A.C. 2005: Genotype by environment interaction in an Australia-wide radiata pine diallel mating experiment: implication for regionalized breeding. Forest Science 51: 29-40.
34. YANG, R.C. 2002: Likelihood-based analysis of genotype-environment interaction. Crop Science 42: 1434-1440.
35. YANG, R.C.; BAKER, R.J. 1991: Genotype-environment interactions in two wheat crosses. Crop Science 31: 83-87