The Benjamini-Hochberg method with infinitely many contrasts in linear models

Biometrika

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 709-719

  Westfall, Peter H ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

False coverage rate; False discovery rate; Multiple comparisons; Multiple testing; Scheff 's method; Waller Duncan method

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949120055     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asn033     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ABRAMOWITZ, M. & STEGUN, I. A. (1970). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. WASHINGTON, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards.
2. BENJAMINI, Y. & HOCHBERG, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57, 289-300.
3. BENJAMINI, Y. & YEKUTIELI, D. (2005). False discovery rate-adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 100, 71-81.
4. DUNCAN, D. B. (1965). A Bayesian approach to multiple comparisons. Technometrics 7, 171-222.
5. EFRON, B., TIBSHIRANI, R., STOREY, J. & TUSHER, V. (2001). Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 96, 1151-60.
6. GENOVESE, C. R. & WASSERMAN, L. (2002). Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 64, 499-518.
7. HOCHBERG, Y. & TAMHANE, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley.
8. HOLLAND, B. & CHEUNG, S. H. (2002). Familywise robustness criteria for multiple comparisons procedures. J. R . Statist. Soc. B 94, 63-77.
9. HSU, J. C. (1996). Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. London: Chapman and Hall.
10. JEFFREYS, H. (1961). The Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press.
11. KESELMAN, H. J., CRIBBIE, R. & HOLLAND, B. (1999). The pairwise multiple comparison multiplicity problem: An alternative approach to familywise and comparisonwise type I error control. Psychol. Meth. 4, 58-69.
12. LEWIS, C. & THAYER, D. T. (2005). A loss function related to the FDR for random effects multiple comparisons. J. Statist. Plan. Infer. 125, 49-58.
13. SCHEFFÉ, H. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 40, 87-110.
14. SHAFFER, J. P. (1999). A semi-Bayesian study of Duncan's Bayesian multiple comparison procedure. J. Statist. Plan. Infer. 82, 197-213.
15. STOREY, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 64, 479-98.
16. STOREY, J. D. (2007). The optimal discovery procedure: A new approach to simultaneous significance testing. J. R . Statist. Soc. B 69, 1-22.
17. WALLER, R. A. & DUNCAN, D. B. (1969). A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 64, 1484-503.
18. WATSON, G. S. (1983). Statistics on Spheres. New York: Wiley.
19. WESTFALL, P. H., JOHNSON, W. O. & UTTS, J. M. (1997). A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika 84, 419-27.
20. WILLIAMS, V. S. L., JONES, L. V. & TUKEY, J. W. (1999). Controlling error in multiple comparisons, with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement. J. Educ. Behav. Statist. 24, 42-69.