Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces

Biometrika

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 759-771

  Chen, Jiahua ^a   Chen, Zehua ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Bayesian paradigm; Consistency; Genome wide association study; Tournament approach; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949108781     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asn034     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AKAIKE, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Ed. B. N. Petrox and F. Caski, pp. 267-81. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
2. BENJAMINI, Y. & HOCHBERG, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate - A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57, 289-300.
3. BERGER, J. O. & PERICCHI, L. R. (2001). Objective Bayesian methods for model selection: Introduction and comparison. In Model Selection, Lecture Notes Monograph Series Volume 38, Ed. P. Lahiri, pp. 135-207. Hayward, CA: Inst. Math. Statist.
4. BOGDAN, M., DOERGE, R. & GHOSH, J. K. (2004). Modifying the Schwarz Bayesian information criterion to locate multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 167, 989-99.
5. BROMAN, K. W. & SPEED, T. P. (2002). A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 64, 641-56.
6. CLYDE, M. A., BERGER, J. O., BULLARD, F., FORD, E. B., JEFFERYS, W. H., LUO, R., PAULO, R. & LOREDO, T. (2007). Current challenges in Bayesian model choice. In Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy IV, Ed. G. F. Babu and E. D. Feigelson, pp. 224-40. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Volume 371.
7. CRAVEN, P. & WAHBA, G. (1979). Smoothing noisy data with spline functions: Estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized cross-validation. Numer. Math. 31, 377-403.
8. CSÖRGÖ, M. & HORVÁTH, L. (1997). Limit Theorems in Change-Point Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. FAN, J. & LI, R. (2001). Variable selection via non-concave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 96, 1348-60.
10. L, cross-validation and generalized cross-validation: Discrete index set. Ann. Statist. 15, 958-75.
11. MARCHINI, J., DONNELLY, P. & CARDON, L. R. (2005). Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nature Genet. 37, 413-7.
12. MEINSHAUSEN, N. & BÜHLMANN, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso. Ann. Statist. 34, 1436-62.
13. RAO, C. R. & WU, Y. H. (1989). A strongly consistent procedure for model selection in a regression problem. Biometrika 76, 369-74.
14. SCHWARZ, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6, 461-4.
15. SHAO, J. (1997). An asymptotic theory for linear model selection. Statist. Sinica 7, 221-64.
16. SIEGMUND, D. (2004). Model selection in irregular problems: Application to mapping quantitative trait loci. Biometrika 91, 785-800.
17. STONE, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions (with Discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B 39, 111-47.
18. TIBSHIRANI, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 58, 267-88.
19. WILKS, S. S. (1938). The large sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Statist. 9, 60-2.
20. YAO, Y. C. (1988). Estimating the number of change-points via Schwartz criterion. Statist. Prob. Lett. 6, 181-9.
21. ZHANG, C. H. & HUANG, J. (2008). The sparsity and bias of the LASSO selection in high-dimensional linear regression. Ann. Statist. 36, 1567-94.
22. ZHAO, P. & YU, B. (2006). On model selection consistency of Lasso. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 2541-67.