Asynchrony tolerance in the perceptual organization of speech

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 861-865

  Remez, Robert E ^a   Ferro, Daria F ^a   Wissig, Stephanie C ^a   Landau, Claire A ^a  

^a Program on US Russia Relations at Columbia s Harriman Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHONETICS; PILOT STUDY; SEMANTICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PHONETICS; PILOT PROJECTS; SEMANTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 50949095010     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.861     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BREGMAN, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. DARWIN, C. J. (1997). Auditory grouping. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 327-333.
3. EGAN, J. P. (1948). Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope, 58, 955-991.
4. FU, Q.-J., & GALVIN, J. J., III (2001). Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1166-1172.
5. GRANT, K. W., VAN WASSENHOVE, V., & POEPPEL, D. (2004). Detection of auditory (cross-spectral) and auditory-visual (cross-modal) synchrony. Speech Communication, 44, 43-53.
6. GREENBERG, S. (1999). Speaking in shorthand - A syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation. Speech Communication, 29, 159-176.
7. GREENBERG, S., & ARAI, T. (1998). Speech intelligibility is highly tolerant of cross-channel spectral asynchrony. In P. Kuhl & L. Crum (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the International Congress on Acoustics (pp. 2677-2678). Melvyl, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
8. KALIKOW, D. N., STEVENS, K. N., & ELLIOTT, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337-1351.
9. LIBERMAN, A. M., & MATTINGLY, I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
10. MUNHALL, K. G., GRIBBLE, P., SACCO, L., & WARD, M. (1996). Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 351-362.
11. NAVARRA, J., VATAKIS, A., ZAMPINI, M., SOTO-FARACO, S., HUMPHREYS, W., & SPENCE, C. (2005). Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 499-507.
12. REMEZ, R. E. (2005). Perceptual organization of speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 28-50). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. REMEZ, R. E., PARDO, J. S., PIORKOWSKI, R. L., & RUBIN, P. E. (2001). On the bistability of sine wave analogues of speech. Psychological Science, 12, 24-29.
14. REMEZ, R. E., RUBIN, P. E., BERNS, S. M., PARDO, J. S., & LANG, J. M. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.
15. REMEZ, R. E., RUBIN, P. E., PISONI, D. B., & CARRELL, T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-949.
16. RUBIN, P. E. (1980). Sinewave synthesis [Internal memorandum]. New Haven, CT: Haskins Laboratories.
17. SABERI, K., & PERROTT, D. R. (1999). Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature, 398, 760.
18. SHANNON, R. V., ZENG, F.-G., KAMATH, V., WYGONSKI, J., & EKELID, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
19. SILIPO, R., GREENBERG, S., & ARAI, T. (1999). Temporal constraints on speech intelligibility as deduced from exceedingly sparse spectral representations. Proceedings of Eurospeech 1999 (pp. 2687-2690). Grenoble: European Speech Communication Association.
20. SMITH, Z. M., DELGUTTE, B., & OXENHAM, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87-90.
21. STEVENS, K. N. (1999). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. (1976). Speech perception. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 243-293). New York: Academic Press.