Effect of the California tobacco control program on personal health care expenditures

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1214-1222

  Lightwood, James M ^a,b   Dinno, Alexis ^a   Glantz, Stanton A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; SMOKING CESSATION; UNITED STATES; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; INCOME; SMOKING;

CALIFORNIA; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HUMANS; INCOME; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 50949094838     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050178     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Institute of Medicine (2007) Ending the tobacco problem: A blueprint for the nation. Washington (D. C.): National Academies Press.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs - 2007. Atlanta (Georgia): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Available: http://www. cdc.gov/tobacco/ tobacco_control_programs/stateandcommunity/ best_practices/index.htm. Accessed 18 June 2008.
3. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA (2000) Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. N Engl J Med 343: 1772-1777.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) Declines in Lung Cancer Rates - California, 1988-1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49: 1066-1069.
5. Jemal A, Cokkinides VE, Shafey O, Thun MJ (2003) Lung cancer trends in young adults: an early indicator of progress in tobacco control (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14: 579-585.
6. Barnoya J, Glantz S (2004) Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in lung cancer incidence. Cancer Causes Control 15: 689-695.
7. Schroeder S (2004) Tobacco control in the wake of the 1998 master settlement agreement. N Engl J Med 350: 293-301.
8. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (2007) A broken promise to our children: The 1998 State Tobacco Settlement nine years later. Washington (D. C.): Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Available: http://www.tobaccofreekids. org/reports/settlements/2008/fullreport.pdf. Accessed 18July 2008.
9. Office of Technology Assessment (1985) Smoking-related deaths and financial costs. Washington (D. C.): Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress.
10. Warner KE, Hodgson TA, Carroll CE (1999) Medical costs of smoking in the United States: estimates, their validity, and their implications. Tob Control 8: 290-300.
11. [No author listed] (2002) Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs - United States, 1995-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51: 300-303.
12. Bal DG, Kizer KW, Felten PG, Mozar HN, Niemeyer D (1990) Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide antitobacco use campaign. JAMA 264: 1570-1574.
13. Tobacco Control Section (1998) A model for change: The California experience in tobacco control. Sacramento (California): California Department of Health Services. Available: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/ Tobacco/Documents/CTCPmodelforchange1998.pdf. Accessed 18July 2008.
14. Bal DG, Lloyd JC, Roeseler A, Shimizu R (2001) California as a model. J Clin Oncol 19: 69S-73S.
15. California Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee (TER-OC) (2000) Toward a TOBACCO-free California: Strategies for the 21st Century 2000-2003. Sacramento (California): California Department of Health Services. Available: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/Tobacco/ Documents/CTCPMasterPlan00- 03.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2008.
16. Engle R, Granger C (1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55: 251-276.
17. Granger CWJ (2003, December 8) Time series analysis, cointegration, and applications [Nobel Lecture]. Available: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/ economics/laureates/2003/granger-lecture.pdf. Accessed 7 February 2008.
18. Burke SP, Hunter J (2005) Modelling non-stationary economic time series: A multivariate approach. New York (New York): Palgrave McMillan.
19. Maddala GS, Kim I-M (1998) Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
20. Tsay RS (2005) Analysis of financial time series. Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons.
21. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller (2007) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available: http:// ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/12831.html. Accessed 18July 2008.
22. Farrelly MC, Pechacek TF, Thomas KY, Nelson D (2008) The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking. Am J Public Health 98: 304-309.
23. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2007) Health expenditures by state of provider: Summary Tables, 1980-2004 (Final, February 2007). Available: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/ 05_NationalHealthAccountsStateHealthAccounts.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed 5 May 2007.
24. [No author listed] (2004) Resident Population for Selected Age Groups: 1980 to 1989: United States Bureau of the Census. Available: http://www. census.gov/popest/archives/1980s/estage80.txt. Accessed 7 December 2007.
25. [No author listed] (2008) State resident population by age and sex, 2000-2006: United States Bureau of the Census. Available: http://www.census.gov/ popest/states/asrh/files/SC_EST2005_AGESEX_RES.csv. Accessed 7 December 2007.
26. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007) Consumer Price Index - All urban consumers (current series). Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available: http:// www.bls.gov/cpi/. Accessed 18 July 2008.
27. Orzechowski & Walker (2005) Tax Burden on Tobacco: Historical Compilation, vol. 40. Arlington (VA): Orzechowski & Walker.
28. California Department of Health Services (2007) Proposition 99 Health Education Account, TCS Funding, CDE, and TRDRDP Budget Appropriation Summary.
29. National Cancer Institute (2005) ASSIST: Shaping the future of tobacco prevention and control. Bethesda (Maryland): National Cancer Institute Smoking and Health Monograph 16. NIH Pub. No. 05-5645. Available: http://cancercontrol. cancer.gov/rCRB/monographs/16/index.html. Accessed 18 July 2008.
30. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2007) R statistical environment. Vienna (Austria). Available: http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 18 July 2008.
31. Glantz S, Balbach E (2000) Tobacco war: Inside the California battles. Berkeley: University of California Press. 336 p.
32. Baltagi BH, Griffin JM (2001) The econometrics of rational addiction: the case of cigarettes. Journal of Economic and Business Statistics 19: 449-454.
33. Gallet CA, List JA (2003) Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities. Health Econ 12: 821-835.
34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) Smoking & Tobacco Use: Consumption Data. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ data_statistics/tables/economics/consumpl.htm. Accessed 17 September 2007.
35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) Percentage of adults who were current, former, or never smokers. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ data_statistics/tables/adult/table_2.htm. Accessed September 17, 2007.
36. Sloan FA, Ostermann J, Picone G, Conover C, Taylor D Jr. (2004) The price of smoking. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.
37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) Prevalence of Adult Smoking by State (BRFSS data). State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) system. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/. Accessed 15 April 2008.
38. Levy DT, Nikolayev L, Mumford E (2005) Recent trends in smoking and the role of public policies: results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model. Addiction 100: 1526-1536.
39. Givel M, Glantz S (2001) Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s. Tob Control 10: 124-134.
40. Givel M, Glantz S (2002) State tobacco settlement funds not being spent on vigorous tobacco control efforts. Oncology 16: 152, 155-157.
41. Ling PM, Glantz SA (2005) Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes. Tob Control 14: e3.