The "beauty myth" is no myth:Emphasis on male-female attractiveness in world folktales

Human Nature

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 174-188

  Gottschall, Jonathan ^a   Anderson, Kacey ^b   Burbank, Chad ^b   Burch, Jasper ^b   Byrnes, Chelsea ^b   Callanan, Christine ^b   Casamento, Nicole ^b   Gardiner, Amy ^b   Gladd, Natalie ^b   Hartnett, Allison ^b   Henry, Elisabeth ^b   Hilarides, Eloise ^b   Lemke, Chelsea ^b   Manganini, Kristen ^b   Merrihew, Sara ^b   Milan Robinson, Tonya ^b   O'Connell, Patrick ^b   Mott, Jessica ^b   Parker, Kimberly ^b   Revoir, Karlin ^b   Riley, Nathan ^b   Robinson, Darcie ^b   Rodriguez, Sheila ^b   Sauve, Chelsea ^b   Spearance, April ^b   Stucker, Valerie ^b   Tapply, Adam ^b   Unser, Alexa ^b   Wall, Christopher ^b   Webb, Alexis ^b   Zocco, Melinda ^b   more..

^a WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

"The beauty myth"; Content analysis; Evolution; Folktales; Physical attractiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 50849145152     PISSN: 10456767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12110-008-9035-3     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In N. A. Chagnon, & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 402-435). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
2. Baker-Sperry, L., & Grauerholz, L. (2003). The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in children's fairy tales. Gender and Society, 17, 711-726.
3. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity. New York: Linden Press.
5. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
6. Cahill, A. (2003). Feminist pleasure and feminine beautification. Hypathia, 18, 42-64.
7. Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27, 3-23.
8. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
9. Darwin, C. (1871/1998). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. New York: Prometheus Books.
10. Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (originally published in 1979).
11. Dundes, A. (1968). Every man his way: Readings in cultural anthropology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Ellis, H. (1927). Studies in the psychology of sex, vol. IV. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
13. Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. New York: Doubleday.
14. Faludi, S. (1992). Backlash: The undeclared war against women. New York: Anchor.
15. Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.
16. Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378-382.
17. Ford, C., & Beach, F. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.
18. Freedman, R. (1986). Beauty bound. New York: Lexington Books.
19. Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.
20. Gangestad, S., & Scheyd, G. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523-548.
21. Gottschall, J. (2005). Quantitative literary study: A modest manifesto and testing the hypotheses of feminist fairy tale studies. In J. Gottschall, & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 199-224). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
22. Gottschall, J. (2007). Greater emphasis on female attractiveness in Homo sapiens: A revised solution to an old evolutionary riddle. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 347-358.
23. Gottschall, J., Berkey, R., Drown, C., Fleischner, M., Glotzbecker, M., Kernan, K., et al. (2005). The heroine with a thousand faces: Universal trends in the characterization of female folk tale protagonists. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 85-103.
24. Gottschall, J., Martin, J., Quish, H., & Rhea, J. (2004). Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 102-112.
25. Haase, D. (2000). Feminist fairy tale scholarship: A critical survey and bibliography. Marvels and Tales: Journal of Fairy-Tale Studies, 14, 15-63.
26. Hansen, J., Reed, E., & Waters, M. (1986). Cosmetics, fashions, and the exploitation of women. New York: Pathfinder Press.
27. Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
28. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
29. Langlois, J., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
30. Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Potter, W., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
32. Ragan, K. (2008). What happened to the heroine in folktales? An analysis by gender of a multicultural sample of published folktales collected from storytellers. Marvels and Tales (in press).
33. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
34. Rhodes, G., & Zebrowitz, L. (Eds.) (2002). In Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive and social perspectives. Westport, CT: Ablex.
35. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D., & Archer, D. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
36. Schoemacher, C. (2004). A critical appraisal of the anorexia statistics in the beauty myth: Introducing Wolf's Overdo and Lie Factor (WOLF). Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 12, 97-102.
37. Sommers, C. H. (1994). Who stole feminism?. New York: Simon and Schuster.
38. Sugiyama, L. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In D. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292-343). New York: Wiley.
39. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2003). Gender and body hair: Constructing the feminine woman. Woman's Studies International Forum, 26, 333-344.
41. Travis, C., Meginnis, K., & Bardari, K. (2000). Beauty, sexuality, and identity: The social control of women. In C. B. Travis, & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism: Psychological perspectives on women (pp. 237-272). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
43. Westermarck, E. (1921). The history of human marriage, vol. I. London: Macmillan.
44. Wolf, N. (2002). The beauty myth: How images of female beauty are used against women. New York: William Morrow, (originally published in 1991).
45. Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston: Peter Edes.