Understanding intention from minimal displays of human activity

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 830-839

  McAleer, Phil ^a   Pollick, Frank E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; INTENTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT;

EID: 50849115131     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.830     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. BARRETT, H. C., TODD, P. M., MILLER, G. E, & BLYTHE, P. W. (2005). Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 313-331.
2. BASSILI, J. N. (1976). Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 33, 680-685.
3. BLAKEMORE, S.-J., BOYER, P., PACHOT- CLOUARD, M., MELTZOFF, A., SEGEBARTH, C., & DECETY, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 837-844.
4. BLOOM, P., & VERES, C. (1999). The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition, 71, B1-B9.
5. BLYTHE, P. W., TODD, P. M., & MILLER, G. F. (1999). How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 257-285). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
7. CAMURRI, A., DE POLI, G., LEMAN, M., & VOLPE, G. (2001). A multilayered conceptual framework for expressive gesture applications. In Proceedings of the International MOSART Workshop on Current Directions in Computer Music (pp. 29-34). Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University, Audiovisual Institute.
8. CAMURRI, A., KRUMHANSL, C. L., MAZZARINO, B., & VOLPE, G. (2004). An exploratory study of anticipating human movement in dance. In Proceed ings of the 2nd International Symposium on Measurement, Analysis and Modeling of Human Functions (pp. 57-60). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
9. CAMURRI, A., LAGERLÖF, I., & VOLPE, G. (2003). Recognizing emotion from dance movement: Comparison of spectator recognition and automated techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 213-225.
10. CAMURRI, A., MAZZARINO, B., & VOLPE, G. (2004). Analysis of expressive gestures: The EyesWeb expressive gesture processing library. In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.), Gesture-based communication in human-computer interaction (pp. 460-467). Berlin: Springer.
11. CAMURRI, A., MAZZARINO, B., VOLPE, G., MORASSO, P., PRIANO, F., & RE, C. (2003). Application of multimedia techniques in the physical rehabilitation of Parkinson's patients. Journal of Visualization & Computer Animation, 14, 269-278.
12. CAMURRI, A., TROCCA, R., & VOLPE, G. (2002). Interactive systems design: A KANSEI-based approach. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 155-162). Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems.
13. CASTELLI, F., FRITH, C., HAPPÉ, F., & FRITH, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 1839-1849.
14. CSIBRA, G., GERGELY, G., BÍRÓ, S., KOÓS, O., & BROCKBANK, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of "pure reason" in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237-267.
15. GELMAN, R., DURGIN, F., & KAUFMAN, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150-184). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
16. GERGELY, G., NÁDASDY, Z., CSIBRA, G., & BÍRÓ, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.
17. HEIDER, F., & SIMMEL, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
18. KUHLMEIER, V., WYNN, K., & BLOOM, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14, 402-408.
19. MCALEER, P., MAZZARINO, B., VOLPE, G., CAMURRI, A., SMITH, K., PATERSON, S., & POLLICK, F. E. (2004). Perceiving animacy and arousal in transformed displays of human interaction. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Measurement, Analysis and Modeling of Human Functions (pp. 67-71 ). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
20. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
21. SCHOLL, B. J., & TREMOULET, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299-309.
22. SZEGO, P. A., & RUTHERFORD, M. D. (2007). Actual and illusory differences in constant speed influence the perception of animacy similarly. Journal of Vision, 7(12): 5, 1-7.
23. TIMMERS, R., MAROLT, M., CAMURRI, A., & VOLPE, G. (2006). Listeners' emotional engagement with performances of a Skriabin etude: An explorative case. Psychology of Music, 34, 481-510.
24. TREMOULET, P. D., & FELDMAN, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943-951.
25. WATSON, A. B., & HU, J. (1999). ShowTime: A QuickTime-based infrastructure for vision research displays. Perception, 28(Suppl.), 45.
26. ZACKS, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28, 979-1008.