Psychometric properties of the Blood Donation Reactions Inventory: A subjective measure of presyncopal reactions to blood donation

Transfusion

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1820-1826

  France, Christopher R ^a   Ditto, Blaine ^b   France, Janis L ^b   Himawan, Lina K ^b  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD DONATION REACTION INVENTORY; BLOOD DONOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DONOR SELECTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRESYNCOPE; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD DONORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SYNCOPE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 50849112363     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01831.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bonk VA, France CR, Taylor BK. Distraction reduces self-reported physiological reactions to blood donation in novice donors with a blunting coping style. Psychosom Med 2001 63 : 447 52.
2. Ditto B, France CR. Vasovagal symptoms mediate the relationship between predonation anxiety and subsequent blood donation in female volunteers. Transfusion 2006 46 : 1006 10.
3. Ditto B, France CR. The effects of applied tension on symptoms in French-speaking blood donors: a randomized trial. Health Psychol 2006 25 : 433 7.
4. Ditto B, France CR, Lavoie P, Roussos M, Adler PS. Reducing reactions to blood donation with applied muscle tension: a randomized controlled trial. Transfusion 2003 43 : 1269 75.
5. Ditto B, Wilkins JA, France CR, Lavoie P, Adler PS. On-site training in applied muscle tension to reduce vasovagal reactions to blood donation. J Behav Med 2003 26 : 53 65.
6. France CR, France JL, Roussos M, Ditto B. Mild reactions to blood donation predict a decreased likelihood of donor return. Transfus Apher Sci 2004 30 : 17 22.
7. France CR, Rader A, Carlson B. Donors who react may not come back: analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions. Transfus Apher Sci 2005 33 : 99 106.
8. France JL, France CR, Himawan LK. A path analysis of intention to redonate among experienced blood donors: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transfusion 2007 47 : 1006 13.
9. Meade MA, France CR, Peterson LM. Predicting vasovagal reactions in volunteer blood donors. J Psychosom Res 1996 40 : 495 501.
10. Newman BH. Vasovagal reactions in high school students: findings relative to race, risk factor synergism, female sex, and non-high school participants. Transfusion 2002 42 : 1557 60.
11. Newman BH. Vasovagal reaction rates and body weight: findings in high- and low-risk populations. Transfusion 2003 43 : 1084 8.
12. Newman BH, Pichette S, Pichette D, Dzaka E. Adverse effects in blood donors after whole-blood donation: a study of 1000 blood donors interviewed 3 weeks after whole-blood donation. Transfusion 2003 43 : 598 603.
13. Newman BH, Tommolino E, Andreozzi C, Joychan S, Pocedic J, Herringhausen J. The effect of a 16-oz. water drink on blood donor reaction rates in high-school students: two independent studies combined. Transfusion 2006 46 : S80A.
14. Sauer LA, France CR. Caffeine attenuates vasovagal reactions in female first-time blood donors. Health Psychol 1999 18 : 403 9.
15. Trouern-Trend JJ, Cable RG, Badon SJ, Newman. BH, Popovsky MA. A case-controlled multicenter study of vasovagal reactions in blood donors: influence of sex, age, donation status, weight, blood pressure, and pulse. Transfusion 1999 39 : 316 20.
16. Kaloupek DG, Scott JR, Khatami V. Assessment of coping strategies associated with syncope in blood donors. J Psychosom Res 1985 29 : 207 14.
17. Kaloupek DG, Stoupakis T. Coping with a stressful medical procedure: further investigation with volunteer blood donors. J Behav Med 1985 8 : 131 48.
18. Kaloupek DG, White H, Wong M. Multiple assessment of coping strategies used by volunteer blood donors: implications for preparatory training. J Behav Med 1984 7 : 35 60.
19. Kasprisin DO, Glynn SH, Taylor F, Miller KA. Moderate and severe reactions in blood donors. Transfusion 1992 32 : 23 6.
20. Beal RW. Vasovagal reactions in blood donors. Med J Aust 1972 2 : 757 60.
21. Labus JS, France CR, Taylor BK. Vasovagal reactions in volunteer blood donors: analyzing the predictive power of the medical fears survey. Int J Behav Med 2000 7 : 62 72.
22. Ogata H, Iinuma N, Nagashima K, Akabane T. Vasovagal reactions in blood donors. Transfusion 1980 20 : 679 83.
23. Schlumpf KS, Glynn SA, Schreiber GB, Wright DJ, Randolph Steele W, Tu Y, Hermansen S, Higgins MJ, Garratty G, Murphy EL National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Factors influencing donor return. Transfusion 2008 48 : 264 72.
24. Nguyen DD, Devita DA, Hirschler NV, Murphy EL. Blood donor satisfaction and intention of future donation. Transfusion 2008 48 : 742 8.
25. Germain M, Glynn SA, Schreiber GB, Gelinas S, King M, Jones M, Bethel J, Tu Y. Determinants of return behavior: a comparison of current and lapsed donors. Transfusion 2007 47 : 1862 70.
26. Newman BH. Blood donor complications after whole-blood donation. Curr Opin Hematol 2004 11 : 339 45.
27. Newman BH. Whole-blood donation: blood donor suitability and adverse events. Curr Hematol Rep 2004 3 : 437 43.
28. Eder AF, Dy BA, Kennedy JM, Notari EP IV, Strupp A, Wissel ME, Reddy R, Gibble J, Haimowitz MD, Newman BH, Chambers LA, Hillyer CD, Benjamin RJ. The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of donation reported in 2006. Transfusion DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x
29. Zou S, Musavi F, Notari EP, Fang CT. Changing age distribution of the blood donor population in the United States. Transfusion 2008 48 : 251 7.
30. Lemmens KP, Abraham C, Hoekstra T, Ruiter RA, De Kort WL, Brug J, Schaalma HP. Why don't young people volunteer to give blood? An investigation of the correlates of donation intentions among young nondonors. Transfusion 2005 45 : 945 55.
31. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus users guide. 3rd ed. Los Angeles : Muthen and Muthen 2005.
32. Satorra A, Bentler PM. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In : von Eye A, Clogg CC, editors. Latent variable analysis: applications for development research. Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage 1994. p. 399 419.
33. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York : Guilford Press 2006.
34. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes for covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999 6 : 1 55.
35. Newman BH. Adjusting our management of female blood donors: the key to an adequate blood supply. Transfusion 2004 44 : 591 6.
36. Hanson SA, France CR. Predonation water ingestion attenuates negative reactions to blood donation. Transfusion 2004 44 : 924 8.