Spring frost risk in a changing climate

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2008, Pages

  Rigby, J R ^a   Porporato, Amilcare ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VEGETATION;

INDEPENDENT PARAMETERS; MEAN TEMPERATURES; MODEL RESULTS; PROBABILISTIC MODEL; CHANGING CLIMATE;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; FORECASTING METHOD; FROST; PHENOLOGY; PROBABILITY; SPRING (SEASON); STOCHASTICITY; TEMPERATURE GRADIENT; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 50849109210     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2008GL033955     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aalen, O., and H. Gjessing (2004), Survival models based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Lifetime Data Anal., 10, 407-423.
2. Chuine, I. (2000), A unified model for budburst of trees, J. Theor. Biol., 207, 337-347.
3. Chuine, I., K. Kramer, and H. Hänninen (2003), Phenology: An Integrative Science, pp. 217-236, Kluwer Acad., New York.
4. Cox, D. R. (1962), Renewal Theory, pp. 1-24, Methuen, London.
5. Dorn, T. (2005), Crops and weather: From planting to harvest 1995-2004, N. C. Agric. Stat., Raleigh. (Available at http://www.ncagr.com/stats/ weather/10yrWeather2005.pdf)
6. Gu, L., P. Hanson, W. Mac Post, D. Kaiser, B. Yang, R. Nemani, S. Pallardy, and T. Meyers (2008), The 2007 eastern US spring freezes: Increased cold damage in a warming world?, Bioscience, 58, 253-262.
7. Gutschick, V., and H. BassiriRad (2003), Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: Toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences, New Phytol., 160, 21-42.
8. Hänninen, H. (1991), Does climatic warming increase the risk of frost damage in northern trees?, Plant Cell Environ., 14, 449-454.
9. Hänninen, H. (1995), Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: An ecophysiological approach to modeling bud burst phenology, Can. J. Bot., 73, 183-199.
10. Hänninen, H. (2006), Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: Identification of critical ecophysiological traits, Tree Physiol., 26, 889-898.
11. Kiraly, A., and I. Janosi (2002), Stochastic modeling of daily temperature fluctuations, Phys. Rev. E, 65, 051102, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevE.65.051102.
12. Kramer, K., A. Friend, and I. Leinonen (1996), Modeling comparison to evaluate the importance of phenology and spring frost damage for the effects of climate change on growth of mixed temperate-zone deciduous forests, Clim. Res., 7, 31-44.
13. Kramer, K., I. Leinonen, and D. Loustau (2000), The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate, and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: An overview, Int. J. Biometeorol., 44, 67-75.
14. Linkosalo, T., T. Carter, R. Häkkinenin, and P. Hari (2000), Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula spp. under climatic warming: A comparison of two models, Tree Physiol., 20, 1175-1182.
15. Sherry, R., X. Zhou, S. Gu, J. Arnone III, D. Schimel, P. Verburg, L. Wallace, and Y. Luo (2007), Divergence of reproductive phenology under climatic warming, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 198-202.