Practical guidelines for radiographers to improve computed radiography image quality

Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Pongnapang, Napapong ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Computed radiography; Image quality; Quality control

Indexed keywords

EID: 50849104317     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18235530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2349/biij.1.2.e12     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Dowsett DJ, Johnston RE, Kenny PA (2005) The Physics of Diagnostic Imaging (2nd ed.) London: Hodder Arnold
2. Fujita H, Ueda K, Morishita J, et al. Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Med. Phys. 1989;16(1): 52-9.
3. Rowlands JA. The physics of computed radiography. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47: R123-R166.
4. Samei E, Seibert JA, Willis CE, et al. Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys. 2001; 28(3): 361-71.
5. Solomon SL, Jost RG, Glazer HS, et al. Artifacts in computed radiography. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157(1): 181-5.
6. Cesar LJ. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers. Radiol Technol 1997; 68(3):225-32.
7. Cesar LJ, Schueler BA, Zink FE, et al. Artefacts found in computed radiography. Brit J Radiol 2001; 74(878): 195-202
8. Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, et al. Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, AAPM On-Line Report No. 03, April 2005.