Staff behaviour and resident engagement before and after active support training

Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 257-270

  Stancliffe, Roger J ^a   Harman, Anthony D ^b   Toogood, Sandy ^c,d   McVilly, Keith R ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Centre for Developmental Disability Studies   (Australia)

^c BETSI CADWALADR UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD   (United Kingdom)

^d BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Active support; Adults; Community living; Group home; Intellectual disability; Praise

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SUPPORT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNITY LIVING; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; RESIDENTIAL HOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GROUP HOMES; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; MENTAL RETARDATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIALIZATION;

EID: 50649124675     PISSN: 13668250     EISSN: 14699532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13668250802318284     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bradshaw, J., McGill, P., Stretton, R., Kelly-Pike, A., Moore, J., Macdonald, S., et al. (2004). Implementation and evaluation of Active Support. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 139-148.
2. Bruininks, R. H., Hill, B. K., Weatherman, R. F., & Woodcock, R. W. (1986). Inventory for Client and Agency Planning (ICAP). Chicago: Riverside Publishing.
3. Centre for Developmental Disability Studies. (2001). Staffing Information Interview. Sydney: Centre for Developmental Disability Studies.
4. Emerson, E., Reeves, D. J., & Felce, D. (2000). Palmtop computer technologies for behavioral observation research. In T. Thompson, D. Felce & F. J. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 47-59). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5. Felce, D., Bowley, C., Baxter, H., Jones, E., Lowe, K., & Emerson, E. (2000). The effectiveness of staff support: Evaluating Active Support training using a conditional probability approach. Research in Developmental Disabilities 21(4), 243-255.
6. Felce, D., Jones, E., & Lowe, K. (2002). Active support: Planning daily activities and support for people with severe mental retardation. In S. Holburn & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning: Research, practice and future directions (pp. 247-269). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7. Jones, E. (n.d.). Active support [Video]. Cardiff, UK: Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities Applied Research Unit.
8. Jones, E., Felce, D., Lowe, K., Bowley, C., Pagler, J., Gallagher, B., & Roper, A. (2001a). Evaluation of the dissemination of Active Support training in staffed community residences. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106(4), 344-358.
9. Jones, E., Felce, D., Lowe, K., Bowley, C., Pagler, J., Strong, G., et al. (2001b). Evaluation of the dissemination of Active Support training and training trainers. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 14(2), 79-99.
10. Jones, E., Perry, J., Lowe, K., Allen, D., Toogood, S., & Felce, D. (1996). Active Support: A handbook for planning daily activities and support arrangements for people with learning disabilities. Booklet 1: Overview; Booklet 2: Activity and support plans; Booklet 3: Opportunity plans; Booklet 4: Teaching plans; Booklet 5: Individual plans; and Booklet 6: Maintaining quality. Cardiff: Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities Applied Research Unit.
11. Jones, E., Perry, J., Lowe, K., Allen, D., Toogood, S., & Felce, D. (2004). Active support: A system for planning daily activities and support arrangements for people with learning disabilities. Cardiff: Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities Applied Research Unit.
12. Jones, E., Perry, J., Lowe, K., Felce, D., Toogood, S., Dunstan, F., et al. (1999). Opportunity and the promotion of activity among adults with severe intellectual disability living in community residences: The impact of training staff in Active Support. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43(3), 164-178.
13. Mansell, J., Beadle-Brown, J., Macdonald, S., & Ashman, B. (2003). Resident involvement in activity in small community homes for people with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(1), 63-74.
14. Mansell, J., Elliott, T., Beadle-Brown, J., Ashman, B., & Macdonald, S. (2002). Engagement in meaningful activity and "active support" of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23(5), 342-352.
15. Reeves, D. (1994). Calculating inter-observer agreement and Cohen's kappa on time-based observational data allowing for "natural" measurement error. Manchester, UK: Hester Adrian Research Centre, University of Manchester.
16. Smith, C., Felce, D., Jones, E., & Lowe, K. (2002). Responsiveness to staff support: Evaluating the impact of individual characteristics on the effectiveness of active support training using a conditional probability approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(8), 594-604.
17. Stancliffe, R. J., Harman, A. D., Toogood, S., & McVilly, K. R. (2007). Australian implementation and evaluation of Active Support. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20(3), 211-227.
18. Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavioural observation data. Hillside, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Toogood, S. (2004a). Activity and support plans, participation index, community log, opportunity plans, and behavioural support objectives. Unpublished manuscript, Bangor University, UK.
20. Toogood, S. (2004b). Interactive Training: Supporting people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities in meaningful activity. Notes for trainers and learners. Bangor, UK: Bangor Centre for Developmental Disabilities, University of Wales, Bangor.
21. Uebersax, J. S. (1987). Diversity of decision-making models and the measurement of interrater agreement. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 140-146.