Sample size and precision in NIH peer review

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2008, Pages

  Kaplan, David ^a   Lacetera, Nicola ^a   Kaplan, Celia ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PEER REVIEW; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SAMPLE SIZE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 50649108777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002761     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. (2008) Enhancing peer review at NIH. Available: http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/. Accessed 2008 July 1.
2. Enhancing peer review: A self-study by the NIH in partnership with the scientific community to strengthen peer review in changing times. Available: http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/meetings/ EnhancingPeerReviewACD2-21-08.pdf. Accessed 2008 July 1.
3. (2006) CSR scoring procedure. Available: http://cms.csr.nih.gov/NR/ rdonlyres/B2CFE17E-AA1C-46E5-BADB-FDBF2FBBEE80/11892/ CSRScoringProcedure090706.pdf. Accessed 2008 July 1.
4. Kaplan D (2007) Statistical analysis of NIH peer review: Identifying innovation. FASEB J 21: 305-308.