Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 265, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1165-1172

  Wagner, Wolfgang ^a   Plinkert, Peter K ^b   Vonthein, Reinhard ^a   Plontke, Stefan K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory threshold; Distortion products; Fine structure; Human; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MONITORING; NOISE; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SCREENING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STIMULUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; ROC CURVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 50649105736     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0593-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. P Boege T Janssen 2002 Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears J Acoust Soc Am 111 1810 1818
2. WE Brownell CR Bader D Bertrand Y de Ribauspierre 1985 Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells Science 227 194 196
3. S Dhar LA Shaffer 2004 Effects of a suppressor tone on distortion product otoacoustic emissions fine structure: why a universal suppressor level is not a practical solution to obtaining single-generator DP-grams Ear Hear 25 573 585
4. SA Gaskill AM Brown 1996 Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: dual origin of 2f1 - f2 J Acoust Soc Am 100 3268 3274
5. SA Gaskill AM Brown 1990 The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1 - f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity J Acoust Soc Am 88 821 840
6. MP Gorga ST Neely PA Dorn D Konrad-Martin 2002 The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth J Acoust Soc Am 111 271 284
7. MP Gorga ST Neely B Ohlrich B Hoover J Redner J Peters 1997 From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss Ear Hear 18 440 455
8. NJ He RA Schmiedt 1996 Effects of aging on the fine structure of the 2f1 - f2 acoustic distortion product J Acoust Soc Am 99 1002 1015
9. J Heitmann B Waldmann PK Plinkert 1996 Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 253 167 171
10. J Heitmann B Waldmann HU Schnitzler PK Plinkert HP Zenner 1998 Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1 - f2 removes DP-gram fine structure-evidence for a secondary generator J Acoust Soc Am 103 1527 1531
11. TA Johnson ST Neely JG Kopun MP Gorga 2006 Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans J Acoust Soc Am 119 3896 3907
12. R Kalluri CA Shera 2001 Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation J Acoust Soc Am 109 622 637
13. DT Kemp R Chum 1980 Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions Hear Res 2 213 232
14. DO Kim 1980 Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations Hear Res 2 297 317
15. D Konrad-Martin ST Neely DH Keefe PA Dorn E Cyr MP Gorga 2002 Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears J Acoust Soc Am 111 1800 1809
16. D Konrad-Martin ST Neely DH Keefe PA Dorn MP Gorga 2001 Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears J Acoust Soc Am 109 2862 2879
17. P Kummer T Janssen W Arnold 1995 Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1 - f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans J Acoust Soc Am 98 197 210
18. BL Lonsbury-Martin GK Martin 1990 The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions Ear Hear 11 144 154
19. GK Martin D Jassir BB Stagner ML Whitehead BL Lonsbury-Martin 1998 Locus of generation for the 2f1 - f2 vs 2f2 - f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations J Acoust Soc Am 103 4 1957 1971
20. M Mauermann B Kollmeier 2004 Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions and the influence of the second DPOAE source J Acoust Soc Am 116 2199 2212
21. Mauermann M, Kollmeier B (2006) Optimale Supressorpegel zur Unterdrückung der sekundären DPOAE Komponente bei unterschiedlichen Primärtonpegeln. Lecture FV02, 9. Annual meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie (German Society for Audiology), March 08 -11, 2006, Köln, Germany, see http://www.dga-ev.com
22. M Mauermann S Uppenkamp PW van Hengel B Kollmeier 1999 Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss J Acoust Soc Am 106 3484 3491
23. PK Plinkert J Heitmann B Waldmann 1997 ["Single generator distortion products"(sgDPOAE). Precise measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by three-tone stimulations] HNO 45 909 914
24. R Probst BL Lonsbury-Martin GK Martin 1991 A review of otoacoustic emissions J Acoust Soc Am 89 2027 2067
25. K Reuter D Hammershoi 2006 Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure analysis of 50 normal-hearing humans J Acoust Soc Am 120 270 279
26. LA Shaffer RH Withnell S Dhar DJ Lilly SS Goodman KM Harmon 2003 Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity Ear Hear 24 367 379
27. CA Shera JJ Guinan Jr 1999 Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs J Acoust Soc Am 105 782 798
28. L Stover MP Gorga ST Neely D Montoya 1996 Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements J Acoust Soc Am 100 956 967
29. XM Sun RA Schmiedt NJ He CF Lam 1994 Modeling the fine structure of the 2f1 - f2 acoustic distortion product. II. Model evaluation J Acoust Soc Am 96 2175 2183
30. CL Talmadge GR Long A Tubis S Dhar 1999 Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions J Acoust Soc Am 105 275 292
31. CL Talmadge A Tubis GR Long C Tong 2000 Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure J Acoust Soc Am 108 6 2911 2932
32. W Wagner PK Plinkert 1999 Relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 256 177 188
33. HP Zenner U Zimmermann U Schmitt 1985 Reversible contraction of isolated mammalian cochlear hair cells Hear Res 18 127 133
34. G Zweig CA Shera 1995 The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions J Acoust Soc Am 98 2018 2047