Comparing the growth and effectiveness of forensic DNA databases

Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 667-668

  Walsh, Simon J ^a,b   Buckleton, John S ^c   Ribaux, Olivier ^d   Roux, Claude ^b   Raymond, Tony ^e  

^a AFP Forensic Services   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^e National Institute of Forensic Science   (Australia)

Author keywords

DNA databases; DNA profiling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENETIC DATABASE; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 50649102810     PISSN: 18751768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. The President's Initiative to Advocate Justice through DNA Technology, Report of the United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, 11 March 2003 (available from www.USDOJ.GOV; accessed 30 April 2003).
2. Simoncelli T., and Steinhardt B. California's Proposition 69: a dangerous precedent for criminal DNA databases. J. Law Med. Ethics 34 2 (2006) 199-213