A new semi-active suspension control strategy through LPV technique

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1519-1534

  Poussot Vassal, C ^a   Sename, O ^a   Dugard, L ^a   Gaspar P ^b   Szabo Z ^b   Bokor, J ^b  

^a GIPSA LAB   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

H control; Linear matrix inequality (LMI); Linear parameter varying (LPV); Semi active suspension

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND EQUIPMENT; AUTOMOBILE SUSPENSIONS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL THEORY; MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL; ROBUST CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SEDIMENTATION;

A-PRIORI; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITY (LMI); LINEAR PARAMETER VARYING (LPV); LINEAR PARAMETER-VARYING; NEW APPROACHES; SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL; SEMI-ACTIVE SUSPENSION; SEMI-ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS; TWO-STATE; VEHICLE MODELLING;

SUSPENSIONS (COMPONENTS);

EID: 50649094933     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ∞: An LMI approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE American control conference (ACC) (pp. 4041-4045), Chicago, IL.
2. ∞ controllers. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 40 5 (1995) 853-864
3. Benson S.J., Ye Y., and Zhang X. Solving large-scale sparse semidefinite programs for combinatorial optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 10 2 (2000) 443-461
4. Biannic, J. M. (1996). Robust control of parameter varying systems: Aerospace applications. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, ONERA (in French).
5. Boyd, S., El-Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., & Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. SIAM studies in applied mathematics.
6. Bruzelius, F. (2004). Linear parameter-varying systems: An approach to gain scheduling. Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology of Göteborg.
7. Bruzelius, F., Pettersson, S., & Breitholtz, C., (2004). Linear parameter-varying description of nonlinear systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE American control conference (ACC) (pp. 1374-1379), Boston, MA.
8. Canale M., Milanese M., and Novara C. Semi-active suspension control using fast model-predictive techniques. IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology 14 6 (2006) 1034-1046
9. ∞ control of active suspensions: An LMI approach. IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology 13 3 (2005) 412-421
10. ∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 41 3 (1996) 358-367
11. Chilali M., Gahinet P., and Apkarian P. Robust pole placement in LMI regions. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 44 12 (1999) 2257-2270
12. Corno M., Savaresi S.M., Tanelli M., and Fabbri L. On optimal motorcycle braking. Control Engineering Practice 16 6 (2008) 644-657
13. 2 controller synthesis for linear parameter varying systems via parameter-dependent lyapunov functions. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 16 (2005) 243-257
14. Delphi (2005). Delphi magneride. Technical Review, Delphi.
15. Delphi (2007). Delphi website. Technical Report, Delphi. 〈http://www.delphi.com〉.
16. Drivet, A., Ramirez-Mendoza, R., Flores, L., Sename, O., Poussot-Vassal, C., & Dugard, L. (2006). Virtual prototyping for vehicle dynamic modelling. In Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on mechatronics systems (pp. 986-991), Heidelberg, Germany.
17. ∞ control with magneto-rheological dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration 283 3-5 (2005) 981-996
18. Fialho I., and Balas G. Road adaptive active suspension design using linear parameter varying gain scheduling. IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology 10 1 (2002) 43-54
19. Fischer D., and Isermann R. Mechatronic semi-active and active vehicle suspensions. Control Engineering Practice 12 (2003) 1353-1367
20. Flores, L., Drivet, A., Ramirez-Mendoza, R., Sename, O., Poussot-Vassal, C., & Dugard, L., (2006). Hybrid optimal control for semi-active suspension systems. In Proceedings of the 10th mini conference on vehicle system dynamics, identification and anomalies, Budapest, Hungary.
21. Gahinet P., Apkarian P., and Chilali M. Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 41 3 (1996) 436-442
22. ∞ control design. In Proceedings of the UKACC international conference on control (pp. 652-657), Swansea, UK.
23. Gáspár P., Szaszi I., and Bokor J. Design of a robust controller for active vehicle suspension using the mixed μ. Vehicle System Dynamics 40 4 (2003) 193-228
24. Gáspár, P., Szaszi, I., & Bokor, J., (2004). Active suspension design using LPV control. In Proceedings of the 1st IFAC symposium on advances in automotive control (AAC) (pp. 584-589), Salerno, Italy.
25. Gillespie, T.D. (1992). Fundamental of vehicle dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers Inc.
26. Giorgeou G., Verros G., and Natsiavas S. Multi-objective optimization of quarter-car models with passive or semi-active suspension system. Vehicle System Dynamics 45 1 (2007) 77-92
27. Giorgetti N., Bemporad A., Tseng H.E., and Hrovat D. Hybrid model predictive control application toward optimal semi-active suspension. International Journal of Control 79 5 (2006) 521-533
28. Giua A., Melas M., Seatzu C., and Usai G. Design of a predictive semiactive suspension system. Vehicle System Dynamics 41 4 (2004) 277-300
29. ∞ error bounds. International Journal Control 39 6 (1984) 1145-1193
30. Gravatt, J.-W. (2003). Magneto-rheological dampers for super-sport motorcycle applications. Master thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
31. Hrovat D. Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control application. Automatica 33 10 (1997) 1781-1817
32. Ieluzzi M., Turco P., and Montiglio M. Development of a heavy truck semi-active suspension control. Control Engineering Practice 14 (2005) 305-312
33. Kawabe T., Isobe O., Watanabe Y., Hanba S., and Miyasato Y. New semi-active suspension controller design using quasi-linearization and frequency shaping. Control Engineering Practice 6 (1998) 1183-1191
34. Koo J.-H., Goncalves F.D., and Ahmadian M. Investigation of the response time of magnetorheological fluid dampers. SPIE 5386 (2004) 63-71
35. Lofberg, J. (2004). Yalmip: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in matlab. In Proceedings of the CACSD conference.
36. Lord (2007). Lord website. Technical Report, Lord. 〈http://www.lord.com〉.
37. Lu J. A frequency-adaptive multi-objective suspension control strategy. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 126 3 (2004) 700-707
38. Lu J., and DePoyster M. Multiobjective optimal suspension control to achieve integrated ride and handling performance. IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology 10 6 (2002) 807-821
39. Nino, E., Ramirez-Mendoza, R., & Guerre, D. (2006). Applying black box model in the identification of MR damper. In Proceedings of the 10th mechatronics forum biennial. Malvern, PA.
40. Pellandra, P., Apkarian, P., Tuan, H. D., & Alazard, D. (2004). Missile autopilot design via a multi-channel LFT/LPV control method. In Proceedings of the 15th IFAC World Congress (WC), Barcelona, Spain.
41. ∞ suspension controller for a multi-body quarter vehicle model. In Proceedings of the 20th symposium of the international association for vehicle system dynamics (IAVSD), Berckeley, CA, USA.
42. 2 control of a half vehicle. In Proceedings of the 10th mini-conference on vehicle system dynamics, identification and anomalies (VSDIA), Budapest, Hungary.
43. Poussot-Vassal, C., Sename, O., Dugard, L., Ramirez-Mendoza, R., & Flores, L. (2006). Optimal Skyhook control for semi-active suspensions. In Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on mechatronics systems (pp. 608-613), Heidelberg, Germany.
44. Raharijaona, T. (2004). Robust Lateral Assistance Control of Vehicle. Ph.D. thesis, Supelec, Université Paris XI d'Orsay (in French).
45. ∞ control of automotive semi-active suspensions. In Proceedings of the 1st IFAC symposium on advances in automotive control (AAC), Salerno, Italy.
46. Sachs (2007). Sachs website. Technical Report, Sachs. 〈http://www.zfsachs.com〉.
47. Sammier, D. (2001). On modelling and control of the automotive suspensions. Ph.D. thesis, INPG, Laboratoire d'Automatique de Grenoble (in French).
48. ∞ control of active vehicle suspensions: Some practical aspects. Vehicle System Dynamics 39 4 (2003) 279-308
49. Savaresi, S. M., Silani, E., & Bittanti, S. (2004). Semi-active suspensions: An optimal control strategy for a quarter-car model. In Proceedings of the 1st IFAC symposium on advances in automotive control (AAC) (pp. 572-577), Salerno, Italy.
50. Savaresi S.M., and Spelta C. Mixed Skyhook and ADD: Approaching the filtering limits of a semi-active suspension. ASME Transactions: Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 129 4 (2007) 382-392
51. Scherer, C. (2004). Robust mixed control and LPV control with full block scaling. Technical Report, Delft University of Technology, Mechanical Engineering Systems and Control Group.
52. Scherer C., Gahinet P., and Chilali M. Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 42 7 (1997) 896-911
53. Scorletti, G. (2004). An introduction to the LMI optimization in automatic control (in French).
54. Shibahata Y. Progress and future direction of chassis control technology. IFAC Annual Reviews in Control 29 1 (2005) 151-158
55. Sturm J.F. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods & Software 11/12 1-4 (1999) 625-653 (interior point methods)
56. ∞ active suspension control. In Proceedings of the IEEE American control conference (ACC) (pp. 48-52), Philadelphia, PA.
57. ∞ control for an integrated suspension system via parametrized linear matrix inequality characterizations. IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology 9 1 (2001) 175-185
58. Zin, A. (2005). Robust automotive suspension control toward global chassis control. Ph.D. thesis, INPG, Laboratoire d'Automatique de Grenoble (in French).
59. Zin, A., Sename, O., Basset, M., Dugard, L., & Gissinger, G. (2004). A nonlinear vehicle bicycle model for suspension and handling control studies. In Proceedings of the IFAC conference on advances in vehicle control and safety (AVCS) (pp. 638-643), Genova, Italy.
60. ∞ control strategy of automotive active suspensions. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC world congress (WC), Praha, Czech Republic.
61. ∞ active suspension control for global chassis technology: Design and performance analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE American control conference (ACC), Minneapolis, MN.
62. ∞ control for active suspensions with performance adaptation in view of the global chassis control. Vehicle System Dynamics, in press, doi:10.1080/00423110701684587.