Point-of-care testing as a tool for screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1070-1075

  Rush, E ^a   Crook, N ^b   Simmons, D ^c  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b LAKES DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD   (New Zealand)

^c CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dysglycaemia; Indigenous health; Point of care; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAPILLARY BLOOD; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; MALE; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; POINT OF CARE TESTING; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENOUS BLOOD;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCEANIC ANCESTRY GROUP; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; PREDIABETIC STATE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 50649093491     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02526.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000 23 : 1143 1148.
2. Singh Dhatt G, Agarwal M, Bishawi B. Evaluation of a glucose meter against analytical quality specifications for hospital use. Clin Chim Acta 2004 343 : 217 221.
3. Cohen M, Boyle E, Delaney C, Shaw J. A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006 71 : 113 118.
4. Savoca R, Jaworek B, Huber AR. New 'plasma referenced' POCT glucose monitoring systems - are they suitable for glucose monitoring and diagnosis of diabetes? Clin Chim Acta 2006 372 : 199 201.
5. Puntmann I, Wosniok W, Haeckel R. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003 41 : 809 820.
6. Kenealy T, Braatvedt G, Scragg R. Screening for type 2 diabetes in non-pregnant adults in New Zealand: practice recommendations. N Z Med J 2002 115 : 194 196.
7. Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, Maclaren NK, McDonald JM, Parrott M. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2002 48 : 436 472.
8. Dunstan DW, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, De Courten MP, Cameron AJ, Sicree RA et al. The rising prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study. Diabetes Care 2002 25 : 829 834.
9. The DECODE Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. Diabetes Epidemiology: collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe. Diabetologia 1999 42 : 647 654.
10. Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie CC, Flegal KM, Eberhardt MS. Comparison of diabetes diagnostic categories in the US population according to the 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1980-1985 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Care 1997 20 : 1859 1862.
11. Hilton DJ, O'Rourke PK, Welborn TA, Reid CM. Diabetes detection in Australian general practice: a comparison of diagnostic criteria. Med J Aust 2002 176 : 104 107.
12. Shaw JE, de Courten M, Boyko EJ, Zimmet PZ. Impact of new diagnostic criteria for diabetes on different populations. Diabetes Care 1999 22 : 762 766.
13. Lim S, Chellumuthi C, Crook N, Rush E, Simmons D. Low prevalence of retinopathy, but high prevalence of nephropathy among Maori with newly diagnosed diabetes. Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes Prevention Strategy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008 80 : 271 274.
14. WHO/IDF. Definition and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycemia - Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland : World Health Organization, 2006.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 1 : 307 310.
16. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989 45 : 255 268.
17. Marley JV, Davis S, Coleman K, Hayhow BD, Brennan G, Mein JK et al. Point-of-care testing of capillary glucose in the exclusion and diagnosis of diabetes in remote Australia. Med J Aust 2007 186 : 500 503.
18. Mahoney J, Ellison J. Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: a critical evaluation of published reports. Clin Chem 2007 53 : 1122 1128.
19. Balion CM, Raina PS, Gerstein HC, Santaguida PL, Morrison KM, Booker L et al. Reproducibility of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) classification: a systematic review. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007 45 : 1180 1185.
20. Alberti G, Zimmet P, Shaw J, Bloomgarden Z, Kaufman F, Silink M. Type 2 diabetes in the young: the evolving epidemic: the International Diabetes Federation consensus workshop. Diabetes Care 2004 27 : 1798 1811.
21. Selvin E, Crainiceanu CM, Brancati FL, Coresh J. Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2007 167 : 1545 1551.
22. Colagiuri S, Sandbaek A, Carstensen B, Christensen J, Glumer C, Lauritzen T et al. Comparability of venous and capillary glucose measurements in blood. Diabet Med 2003 20 : 953 956.
23. Buhling KJ, Henrich W, Kjos SL, Siebert G, Starr E, Dreweck C et al. Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy. Clin Biochem 2003 36 : 333 337.
24. Cheng C, Kushner H, Falkner BE. The utility of fasting glucose for detection of prediabetes. Metabolism 2006 55 : 434 438.
25. Khan AI, Vasquez Y, Gray J, Wians FH Jr, Kroll MH. The variability of results between point-of-care testing glucose meters and the central laboratory analyzer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006 130 : 1527 1532.
26. Wehmeier M, Arndt BT, Schumann G, Kulpmann WR. Evaluation and quality assessment of glucose concentration measurement in blood by point-of-care testing devices. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006 44 : 888 893.
27. Simmons D, Williams DR. Random blood glucose as a screening test for diabetes in a biethnic population. Diabet Med 1994 11 : 830 835.
28. Sogaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E, Thelle D. The Oslo Health Study: the impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health 2004 3 : 3.
29. Lissner L, Heitmann BL, Bengtsson C. Population studies of diet and obesity. Br J Nutr 2000 83 : S21 S24.