Variational optimal control technique for the tracking of deformable objects

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Papadakis, Nicolas ^a   Mémin, Etienne ^a,b,c  

^a CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

^b Centro de Fisica y Matematica de America del Sur Buenos Aires   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER VISION; INTERSECTIONS;

CLOSED CURVES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; OPTIMAL CONTROL TECHNIQUE;

DEFORMATION;

EID: 50649092394     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408944     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. A. Bartesaghi and G. Sapiro. Tracking of moving objects under severe and total occlusions. Int. Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP'05), 1:301-304, 2005.
2. A. Bennet. Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
3. A. Blake and M. Isard. Active contours. Springer-Verlag, London, England, 1998.
4. T. Chan and L. Vese. Active contours whitout edges. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 10(2):266-277, 2001.
5. D. Cremers and S. Soatto. Motion competition: A variational framework for piecewise parametric motion segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 62(3):249-265, 2005.
6. R. Goldenberg, R. Kimmel, E. Rivlin, and M. Rudzsky. Fast geodesic active contours. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 10(10):1467-1475, 2001.
7. T. Jiang and C. Tomasi. Level-set curve particles. In Proc. Europ. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV'06), 2006.
8. R. Kimmel and A. M. Bruckstein. Tracking level sets by level sets: a method for solving the shape from shading problem. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 62(1):47-58, 1995.
9. F.-X. Le Dimet and O. Talagrand. Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects. Tellus, pages 97-110, 1986.
10. M. Leventon, E. Grimson, and O. Faugeras. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision Pattern Rec. (CVPR'00), 2000.
11. J. Lions. Optimal control of systems governed by PDEs. Springer-Verlag, 1971.
12. A. Mansouri. Region tracking via level set PDEs without motion computation. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell., 24(7):947-961, 2003.
13. P. Martin, P. Réfrégier, F. Goudail, and F. Gurault. Influence of the noise model on level set active contours segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell., 26(6):799-803, 2004.
14. E. Mémin and P. Pérez. Dense estimation and object-based segmentation of the optical flow with robust techniques. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 7(5):703-719, 1998.
15. M. Niethammer and A. Tannenbaum. Dynamic geodesic snakes for visual tracking. In IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision and Pattern Rec. (CVPR'04), 2004.
16. S. Osher and J. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulation. J. of Comput. Physics, 79:12-49, 1988.
17. N. Papadakis, T. Corpetti, and E. Mémin. Dynamically consistent optical flow estimation. In International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV'07, October 2007.
18. N. Paragios. A level set approach for shape-driven segmentation and tracking of the left ventricle. IEEE trans. on Med. Imaging, 22(6), 2003.
19. N. Paragios and R. Deriche. Geodesic active regions: a new framework to deal with frame partition problems in computer vision. J. of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 13:249-268, 2002.
20. Y. Rathi, N. Vaswani, A. Tannenbaum, and A. J. Yezzi. Particle filtering for geometric active contours with application to tracking moving and deforming objects. In Proc. Conf. Comp. Vision Pattern Rec. (CVPR'05), 2005.
21. J. Sethian. Level set methods. Cambridge University-Press, 1996.
22. S. Soatto, A. Yezzi, and A. Duci. Geometric level sets methods in imaging vision and graphics. Springer Verlag, 2003.