Transposed conditionals, shrinkage, and direct and indirect unbiasedness

Epidemiology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 652-654

  Senn, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFERENTIAL STATISTICS; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LOGIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; LOGIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 50549104473     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318181b3e3     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Ioannidis JPA. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology. 2008;19:640-648.
2. Senn SJ. In defence of analysis of covariance: a reply to Chambless and Roeback [letter; comment]. Stat Med. 1995;14:2283-2285.
3. Pocock SJ, White I. Trials stopped early: too good to be true? [comment] [see comments]. Lancet. 1999;353:943-944.