Seismic design loads from site-specific and aggregate hazard analyses

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1849-1862

  Malhotra, Praveen K ^a  

^a FM Global Australian Operations   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; HAZARDS; IGNITION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY; TANKERS (SHIPS);

DESIGN LOADS; SITE-SPECIFIC;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

CONTROL SYSTEM; LOADING; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD;

EID: 50549086240     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120070241     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., and R. R. Youngs (1992). A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82, no. 1, 505-510.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2007). The New Orleans hurricane protection system: what went wrong and why, a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers Hurricane Katrina External Review Panel, ASCE, Reston, VA.
3. Bazzurro, R., and N. Luco (2005). Accounting for uncertainty and correlation in earthquake loss estimation, Proc. ICOSSAR 2005, Safety and Reliability of Engineering Systems and Structures.
4. Bommer, J. J., and H. Crowley (2006). The influence of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modeling, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4, no. 3, 231-248.
5. Bommer, J. J., and R. Pinho (2006). Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance-based seismic design, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35, 39-55.
6. Boore, D. M., and G. M. Atkinson (2007). Boore-Atkinson NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters, PEER Report 2007/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
7. Brillinger, D. R., and H. K. Preisler (1984). An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, no. 4, 1441-1450.
8. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (1998).1997 Edition NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, FEMA 302/303, Part 1 (Provisions) and Part 2 (Commentary), developed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
9. Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2007). Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters, PEER Report 2007/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
10. Cornell, C. A. (1971). Probabilistic analysis of damage to structures under seismic loads, in Dynamic Waves in Civil Engineering, D. A. Howells, I. P. Haigh and C. Taylor (Editors), Wiley, New York, 473-488.
11. Cramer, C. H., and M. D. Petersen (1996). Predominant seismic source distance and magnitude maps for Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura Counties, California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, no. 5, 1645-1649.
12. Crowley, H., and J. J. Bommer (2006). Modelling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4, no. 3, 249-273.
13. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) (2006). Connections: Joseph P. Nicoletti. EERI Oral History Series, Interviewer: Stanley Scott. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
14. Esteva, L. (1970). Seismic risk and seismic design decisions, in Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, R. J. Hansen (Editor), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Harmsen, S., and A. Frankel (2001). Geographic deaggregation of seismic hazard in the United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, no. 1, 13-26.
16. International Code Council (ICC) (2000). International Building Code (IBC) 2000, Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc., Country Club Hills, IL; International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA; Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc., Birmingham, AL.
17. Leonard, G., and D. M. Steinberg (2002). Seismic hazard assessment: simultaneous effect of earthquakes at close and distant sites, Earthq. Spectra 18, no. 4, 615-629.
18. Leyendecker, E. V., R. J. Hunt, A. D. Frankel, and K. S. Rukstales (2000). Development of maximum considered earthquake ground motion maps, Earthq. Spectra 16, no. 1, 557-578.
19. Malhotra, P. K. (2005). Return period of design ground motions, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, no. 6, 693-699.
20. Malhotra, P. K. (2006). Seismic risk and design loads, Earthq. Spectra 22, no. 1, 115-128.
21. MathWorks (2006). MATLAB routine for generating latin-hypercube sample with normal distribution, lhsnorm The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
22. May, P. (2001). Social perspectives about earthquake performance: the fallacy of "acceptable risk", Earthq. Spectra 17, no. 4, 725-737.
23. McGuire, R. K. (1995). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, no. 5, 1275-1284.
24. McGuire, R. K. (2004). Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 221 pp.
25. Reiter, L. (1991). Earthquake hazard analysis - issues and insights, Columbia University Press, New York, 254 pp.
26. Rhoades, D. A., and G. H. McVerry (2001). Joint hazard of earthquake shaking at two or more locations, Earthq. Spectra 17, no. 4, 697-710.
27. Smith, W. D. (2003). Earthquake hazard and risk assessment in New Zealand by Monte Carlo methods, Seism. Res. Lett. 74, no. 3, 298-304.
28. Stein, S. (2005). Comment on "How can seismic hazard in the New Madrid Seismic Zone be similar to that in California?" by Arthur Frankel, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, no. 3, 364-365.
29. Wang, M., and T. Takada (2005). Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions, Earthq. Spectra 21, no. 4, 1137-1156.
30. Wang, Z., B. Shi, and J. D. Kiefer (2005). Comment on "How can seismic hazard in the New Madrid Seismic Zone be similar to that in California?" by Arthur Frankel, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, no. 4, 466-471.
31. Wells, D. L., and K. J. Coppersmith (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, no. 4, 974-1002.
32. Wesson, R. L., and D. M. Perkins (2001). Spatial correlation of probabilistic earthquake ground motion and loss, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, no. 6, 1498-1515.