Stability analysis for real-time pseudodynamic and hybrid pseudodynamic testing with multiple sources of delay

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1269-1293

  Mercan, Oya ^a   Ricles, James M ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Delay dependent stability analysis; Real time hybrid pseudodynamic testing; Real time pseudodynamic testing; Restoring force; Time delay

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; CONTROL THEORY; MISSILES; NEURAL NETWORKS; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY; PULSE SHAPING CIRCUITS; ROOT LOCI; SYSTEM STABILITY; TESTING;

DELAY-DEPENDENT STABILITY ANALYSIS; REAL-TIME HYBRID PSEUDODYNAMIC TESTING; REAL-TIME PSEUDODYNAMIC TESTING; RESTORING FORCE; TIME DELAY;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; DAMPING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; NUMERICAL METHOD; STABILITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 50449083804     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.814     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dermitzakis SN, Mahin SA. Development of substructuring techniques for online computer controlled seismic performance testing. Report No. UCB/EERC-85/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1985.
2. Shing PB, Mahin SA. Experimental error propagation in pseudodynamic testing. Report No. UCB/EERC-83/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1983.
3. Horiuchi T, Inoue M, Konno T, Namita Y. Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:1121-1141.
4. Wallace MI, Sieber J, Nield SA, Wagg DJ, Krauskopf B. Stability analysis of real-time dynamic substructuring using delay differential equations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1817-1832.
5. Kyrychko YN, Blyuss KB, Gonzalez-Buelga A, Hogan SJ, Wagg DJ. Real-time dynamic substructuring in a coupled oscillator-pendulum system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 2006; 462:1271-1294.
6. Wu B, Xu G, Wang Q, Williams MS. Operator-splitting method for real-time substructure testing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:293-314.
7. Mercan O, Ricles JM. Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:1523-1543.
8. Gu K, Kharitonov VL, Chen J. Stability of Time-delay Systems. Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, 2003.
9. Darby AP, Williams MS, Blakeborough A. Stability and delay compensation for real-time substructure testing. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002; 128:1276-1284.
10. Mercan O. Analytical and experimental studies on large-scale, real-time pseudodynamic testing. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2007.
11. Rekasius ZV. A stability test for systems with delay. Proceedings of the Joint Automatic Control Conference, San Francisco, U.S.A., 1980; Paper no. TP9-A.
12. Ogata K. Modern Control Engineering (4th edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2002.
13. The Math Works, Inc. MATLAB. The Math Works, Inc.: Natick, MA, 2007.
14. Waterloo Maple, Inc. Maple. Waterloo Maple, Inc.: Waterloo, Ont., 2007.
15. Bajaj C. Limitations to algorithm solvability: Galois methods and models of computation. Proceedings of the Fifth Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1986; 71-76.