Analysis of prefitting versus postfitting hearing aid orientation using the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP)

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 311-323

  Kemker, Brett E ^a   Holmes, Alice E ^b  

^a LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Benefit; Disability; Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile; Hearing aid orientation; Hearing aids; Perceived handicap; Prefitting hearing aid orientation; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 5044252630     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.4.5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abrams H, Hnath-Chisolm T, Guerreiro S, Ritterman S. (1992) The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear Hear 5:371-377.
2. Alpiner JG, Chevrette W, Glascoe G, Metz M, Olsen B. (1974) The Denver scale of communication function. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver.
3. American National Standards Institute. (1989) Criteria for Permissible Ambient Noise during Audiometric Testing (ANSI S3.1-1991). New York: ANSI.
4. American National Standards Institute. (1991) Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1989). New York: ANSI.
5. American Speech and Hearing Association. (1997) Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. Rockville, MD: ASHA.
6. Brooks DN. (1979) Counseling and its effects in hearing aid use. Scand Audiol 8:101-107.
7. Butler GS, Hurley CAM, Buchanan KL, Smith-VanHorne J. (1996) Prehospital education: Effectiveness with total hip replacement surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns 29:189-197.
8. Demorest ME, Erdman SA. (1987) Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 52:129-142.
9. Feste C, Anderson RM. (1995) Empowerment: From philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns 26:139-144.
10. Fleiss JL. (1986) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley.
11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. (1975) Minimental status: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189-198.
12. Gatehouse S. (1997) Approaches to the evaluation of the benefits provided by hearing aids and other rehabilitative services. Paper presented at the Annual Summer Institute of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, Magog, Quebec.
13. Giolas TG, Owens E, Lamb SH, Shubert ED. (1979) Hearing Performance Inventory. J Speech Hear Disord 29:215-230.
14. Hathaway D. (1986) Effect of preoperative instruction on postoperative outcomes: A meta-analysis. Nurs Res 35:269-275.
15. High W, Fairbanks G, Glorig A. (1964) Scale for self-assessment of hearing handicap. J Speech Hear Disord 29:215-230.
16. Hutton CL. (1991) Considerations in design and use of scales in rehabilitative audiology. J Am Acad Audiol 2:115-122.
17. Kaplan H, Bally S, Brandt F. (1991) Communication scale for deaf adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2:164-182.
18. Kricos PB, Lesner SA, Sandridge SA. (1991) Expectations of older adults regarding the use of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2:129-133.
19. McCarthy PA, Alpiner JG. (1980) The McCarthy-Alpiner Scale of Hearing Handicap. Unpublished manuscript.
20. McCarthy PA, Montgomery A, Mueller HG. (1990) Decision making in rehabilitative audiology. J Am Acad Audiol 1:23-30.
21. Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. (1982) The effects of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: An analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health 72:141-151.
22. Newman C, Weinstein B. (1986) Judgements of perceived hearing handicap by hearing-impaired elderly men and their spouses. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 19:109-115.
23. Noble WG, Atherly GR. (1970) The hearing measure scale, a questionnaire for the assessment of auditory disability. J Auditory Res 10:229-250.
24. Rappaport J. (1987) Terms of empowerment/examples of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. Am J Couns Psychol 15:121-149.
25. Schow RL, Balsara NR, Smedley TC, Whitcomb CJ. (1993) Aural rehabilitation by ASHA audiologists, 1980-1990. Am J Audiol 2:28-37.
26. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
27. Speaks C, Jerger J, Trammell J. (1970) Measurement of hearing handicap. J Speech Hear Res 13:768-776.
28. Ventry I, Weinstein BE. (1983) Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA 25:37-42.
29. Wallerstein N, Bernstein E. (1988) Empowerment education: Freire's ideas adapted to health education. Health Educ Q 15:379-394.
30. Ward PR. (1981) Effectiveness of aftercare for older people prescribed a hearing aid for the first time. Scand Audiol 10:99-106.
31. Ward P, Gowers J. (1980) Fitting hearing aids: The effects of methods of instruction. Br J Audiol 14:15-18.
32. Webber GC. (1990) Patient education: A review of the literature. Med Care 28:1089-1103.
33. Weisberg S. (1980) Applied linear regression. Residuals and Influence. New York: Wiley, 106-113.