Moving instruction to the web: Writing as multi‐tasking

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 319-336

  Kramer, Robert ^a   Bernhardt, Stephen A ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5044241828     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10572259909364671     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1969. Visual Thinking, Berkeley and Los Angles: U of California P.
2. Bernhardt, Stephen A., 1986. “Seeing the Text.”. College Composition and Communication, 37: 66–78.
3. Bolter, Jay D., 1991. Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Brasseur, Lee. 1997. “Visual Literacy in the Computer Age: A Complex Perceptual Landscape.”. In Computers and Technical Communication: Pedagogical and Programmatic Perspectives., Edited by: Selber, Stuart. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
5. Grice, Roger. 1993. “Usability and Hypermedia: Toward a Set of Usability Criteria and Measures.”. Technical Communication, 3: 429–37.
6. Horton, William. 1991. Illustrating Computer Documentation., New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7. Jorn, Linda, Duin, Ann Hill, and Wahlstrom, Billie. 1996. “Designing and Managing Virtual Learning Communities.”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39.4: 183–91.
8. Kolosseus, Beverly, Bauer, Dan, and Bernhardt, Stephen. 1995. “From Writer to Designer: Modeling Composing Processes in a Hypertext Environment.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 4: 79–93.
9. Kramer, Robert, and Bernhardt, Stephen. 1996. “Teaching Text Design.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5: 35–60.
10. Lanham, Richard. 1993. The Electronic Word, Chicago: U of Chicago P.
11. Reilly, Colleen, and L'Eplattenier, Barbara. 1996. “Redefining Collaboration through the Creation of World Wide Web Sites.”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39.4: 215–23.
12. Wickliff, Gregory, and Tovey, Janice. 1995. “Hypertext in a Professional Writing Course.”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 4.1: 47–61.