Clinical diagnosis and imaging of sacroiliitis, Innsbruck, Austria, October 9, 2003

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 2041-2047

  Klauser, Andrea ^a   Bollow, Matthias ^b   Calin, Andrei ^c   Frauscher, Ferdinand ^a   Kainberger, Franz ^d   Moncayo, Roy ^a   Salvarani, Carlo ^e   Sieper, Joachim ^b   Zur Nedden, Dieter ^a   Schirmer, Michael ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c ROYAL NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES   (United Kingdom)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e S MARIA NUOVA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRIA; BONE DESTRUCTION; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE ACTIVITY; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SACROILIITIS; SCINTIGRAPHY; SCREENING TEST; INFLAMMATION; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW; SACROILIAC JOINT; SPONDYLITIS;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; INFLAMMATION; SACROILIAC JOINT; SPONDYLITIS;

EID: 5044240629     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Braun J, Sieper J, Bollow M. Imaging of sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 2000;19:51-7.
2. Zink A, Braun J, Listing J, Wollenhaupt J. Disability and handicap in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis - results from the German rheumatological database. German Collaborative Arthritis Centers. J Rheumatol 2000;27:613-22.
3. Sieper J, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Boonen A, Zink A. Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61 Suppl 3:iii8-18.
4. Calin A, Porta J, Fries JF, Schurman DJ. Clinical history as a screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA 1977;237:2613-4.
5. Zeidler H. Spondyloarthritiden. In: Klinische immunologie. Peter HH, Pichler W, editors. 2nd ed. Munich, Baltimore: Urban und Schwarzenberg; 1996.
6. Dejo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA 1992;268:760-5.
7. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281-5.
8. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286-91.
9. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281-5.
10. Brandt J, Westhoff G, Rudwaleit M, et al. Adaptation and validation of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for use in Germany. Z Rheumatol 2003;62:264-73.
11. Bollow M, Loreck D, Banzer D, et al. Imaging diagnosis in suspected inflammatory rheumatoid axial skeleton diseases (sacroiliitis). Z Rheumatol 1999;58:61-70.
12. Ruof J, Stucki G. Validity aspects of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in ankylosing spondylitis: a literature review. J Rheumatol 1999;26:966-70.
13. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache JP, et al. Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein in axial involvement of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1999;26:971-4.
14. Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, de Klerk E, et al. Relative value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1999;26:980-4.
15. Olivieri I, Cantini F, Salvarani C. Diagnostic and classification criteria, clinical and functional assessment, and therapeutic advances for spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1997;9:284-90.
16. Luong AA, Salonen DC. Imaging of the seronegative spondyloarthropathies. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2000;2:288-96.
17. Calin A, Mackay K, Santos H, Brophy S. A new dimension to outcome: application of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index. J Rheumatol 1999;26:988-92.
18. Wanders AJB, Landewe RBM, van der Linden S, et al. What is the most appropriate scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis in clinical trials? A comparison of the available methods based on the OMERACT filter [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48 Suppl:S1099.
19. Van der Heijde DMF, Landewe RB, Spoorenberg A, et al. Can a historical cohort of patients with ankylosing spondylitis containing data of 2-year radiographic progression serve as a control group to assess inhibition of structural damage by TNF-blockers? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48 Suppl:S1100.
20. MacKay K, Mack C, Brophy S, Calin A. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI): a new, validated approach to disease assessment. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:2263-70.
21. Battistone MJ, Manaster BJ, Reda DJ, Clegg DO. Radiographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis - are sacroiliac views really better? J Rheumatol 1998;25:2395-401.
22. Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Egund N, et al. Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 2003;44:218-29.
23. Stabler A, Steiner W, Kohz P, Bartl R, Berger H, Reiser M. Time-dependent changes of insufficiency fractures of the sacrum: intraosseous vacuum phenomenon as an early sign. Eur Radiol 1996;6:655-7.
24. Battafarano DF, West SG, Rak KM, Fortenbery EJ, Chantelois AE. Comparison of bone scan, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of active sacroiliitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1993;23:161-76.
25. Yu W, Feng F, Dion E, Yang H, Jiang M, Genant HK. Comparison of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of sacroiliitis accompanying ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:311-20.
26. Czembirek H, Frühwald F, Kainberger F, editors. Orientierungshilfe Radiologie, Anleitung zum optimalen Einsatz der klinischen Radiologie. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Ärztekammer; 2002.
27. Wittram C, Whitehouse GH, Williams JW, Bucknall RC. A comparison of MR and CT in suspected sacroiliitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:68-72.
28. Chase WF, Houk RW, Winn RE, Hinzman GW. The clinical usefulness of radionuclide scintigraphy in suspected sacro-iliitis: a prospective study. Br J Rheumatol 1983;22:67-72.
29. Miron SD, Khan MA, Wiesen EJ, Kushner I, Bellon EM. The value of quantitative sacroiliac scintigraphy in detection of sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 1983;2:407-14.
30. Hanly JG, Mitchell MJ, Barnes DC, MacMillan L. Early recognition of sacroiliitis by magnetic resonance imaging and single photon emission computed tomography. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2088-95.
31. Yildiz A, Gungor F, Tuncer T, Karayalcin B. The evaluation of sacroiliitis using 99mTc-nanocolloid and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:785-94.
32. Blum U, Buitrago-Tellez C, Mundinger A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of active sacroiliitis - a prospective study comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, and contrast enhanced MRI. J Rheumatol 1996;23:2107-15.
33. Ahlstrom H, Feltelius N, Nyman R, Hallgren R. Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joint inflammation. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1763-9.
34. Bollow M, Fischer T, Reisshauer H, et al. Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies: T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis - cellularity correlates with the degree of enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:135-40.
35. Brandt J, Haibel H, Cornely D, et al. Successful treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1346-52.
36. Bollow M, Braun J, Hamm B, et al. Early sacroiliitis in patients with spondyloarthropathy: evaluation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:529-36.
37. Oostveen J, Prevo R, den Boer J, van de Laar M. Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 1999;26:1953-8.
38. Brandt J, Bollow M, Haeberle J, et al. Studying patients with inflammatory back pain and arthritis of the lower limbs clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging: many, but not all patients with sacroiliitis have spondyloarthropathy. Rheumatology 1999;38:831-6.
39. Braun J, Bollow M, Eggens U, Konig H, Distler A, Sieper J. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with fast imaging in the detection of early and advanced sacroiliitis in spondylarthropathy patients. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37:1039-45.
40. Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Schiottz-Christensen B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Abnormalities correlated to clinical and laboratory findings. Rheumatology Oxford 2004;43:234-7.
41. Muche B, Bollow M, Francois RJ, Sieper J, Hamm B, Braun J. Anatomic structures involved in early- and late-stage sacroiliitis in spondylarthritis: a detailed analysis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1374-84.
42. Bollow M, Biedermann T, Kannenberg J, et al. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to detect sacroiliitis in HLA-B27 positive and negative children with juvenile arthritides. J Rheumatol 1998;25:556-64.
43. Bollow M, Braun J, Biedermann T, et al. Use of contrast-enhanced MR imaging to detect sacroiliitis in children. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:606-16.
44. Arslan H, Sakarya ME, Adak B, Unal O, Sayarlioglu M. Duplex and color Doppler sonographic findings in active sacroiliitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:677-80.
45. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Schirmer M, Springer P, Feuchtner F, Zur Nedden D. Value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic evaluation of active sacroiliitis [abstract]. Eur Radiol 2003;Suppl:465.
46. Klauser A, Springer P, Frauscher F, Schirmer M. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of active sacroiliitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46 Suppl:S426.
47. Klauser A, Schirmer M, Springer P, et al. Value of contrast enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of active sacroiliitis [abstract]. Radiology 2002;Suppl:225:634.
48. Feldtkeller E. Age at disease onset and delayed diagnosis of spondyloarthropathies. Z Rheumatol 1999;58:21-30.
49. Braun J, Golder W, Bollow M, Sieper J, van der Heijde D. Imaging and scoring in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002;20 Suppl 28:S178-84.