Accuracy analysis of super compact scheme in non-uniform grid with application to parabolized stability equations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 485-505

  Esfahanian, V ^a   Ghader, S ^b   Ashrafi, Kh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center ASMERC   (Iran)

Author keywords

Blasius boundary layer; Fourier analysis; Modified equation; Non uniform grid; Numerical accuracy; PSE; Super compact scheme

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; STABILITY;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; GRID POINTS; SUPER COMPACT FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD (SCFDM);

FLOW OF FLUIDS;

BOUNDARY LAYER; FINITE DIFFERENCE TECHNIQUE; MATHEMATICAL METHOD;

EID: 5044239301     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.767     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Numerov BV. A method of extrapolation of perturbations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1924; 84:592-601.
2. Fox L, Goodwin ET. Some new methods for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society for Mathematics and Physics 1949; 45:373-388.
3. Kreiss HO, Oliger J. Comparison of accurate methods for the integration of hyperbolic equations. Tellus 1972; 24:199-215.
4. Hirsh SR. Higher order accurate difference solutions of fluid mechanics problems by a compact differencing technique. Journal of Computational Physics 1975; 19:90-109.
5. Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103:16-42.
6. Dexun Fu, Yanwen Ma. High resolution schemes. In Computational Fluid Dynamics Review, Hafez M, Oshima K (eds). Wiley: New York, 1995.
7. Yanwen Ma, Dexun Fu. Super compact finite difference method with uniform and non-uniform grid system. Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 3, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, 1995.
8. Yanwen Ma, Dexun Fu. Super compact finite difference method (SCFDM) with arbitrary high accuracy. Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal 1996; 5(2):259-276.
9. Dexun Fu, Yanwen Ma. Analysis of super compact finite difference method and application for simulation of vortex-shock interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2001; 36:773-805.
10. Vichnevetsky R, Bowles JB. Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations. SIAM: Philadelphia, 1982.
11. Warming RF, Hyet BJ. The modified equation approach to the stability and accuracy analysis of finite difference methods. Journal of the Computational Physics 1974; 14:159-179.
12. Tannehil JC, Anderson DA, Pletcher RH. Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer (2nd edn). Taylor & Francis: Bristol, PA, 1997.
13. White FM. Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
14. Esfahanian V. Computational and stability analysis of laminar flow over a blunted cone in hypersonic flow. Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 1991.
15. Bertolotti FP. Linear and nonlinear stability of the boundary layers with streamwise varying properties. Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 1991.
16. Kachanov YS, Levchenko VY. The resonant interaction of disturbances at laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1984; 138:209-247.
17. Esfahanian V, Hejranfar K, Sabetghadam F. Linear and non-linear PSE for stability analysis of the Blasius boundary layer using compact scheme. Journal of Fluids Engineering (ASME) 2001; 123(3):545-550.
18. Fasel HF, Rist U, Konzelmann U. Numerical investigation of the three-dimensional development in boundary-layer transition. AIAA Journal 1990; 28(1):29-37.