Partitioned Bremer support localises significant conflict in bee flies (Diptera:Bombyliidae:Anthracinae)

Invertebrate Systematics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 351-360

  Lambkin, Christine L ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Character incongruence; Localised conflict; PBS

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; FLY; TAXONOMY;

ANTHRACINAE; ANTHRACINI; APOIDEA; BOMBYLIIDAE; DIPTERA; EXOPROSOPINI; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; VILLINI;

EID: 5044231178     PISSN: 14455226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/IS04004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baker, R. H., and DeSalle, R. (1997). Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophilids. Systematic Biology 46, 654-673.
2. Baker, R. H., Yu, X., and DeSalle, R. (1998). Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 427-436. doi:10.1006/MPEV.1998. 0519
3. Barrett, M., Donoghue, M. J., and Sober, E. (1991). Against consensus. Systematic Zoology 40, 486-493.
4. Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
5. Bremer, K. (1994). Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304. doi:10.1006/CLAD.1994.1019
6. Buckley, T. R., Simon, C., Flook, P. K., and Misof, B. (2000). Secondary structure and conserved motifs of the frequently sequenced domains IV and V of the insect mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene. Insect Molecular Biology 9, 565-580. doi:10.1046/J.1365-2583.2000.00220.X
7. Chippindale, P. T., and Wiens, J. J. (1994). Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43, 278-287.
8. Creer, S., Malhotra, A., and Thorpe, R. S. (2003). Assessing the Phylogenetic Utility of Four Mitochondrial Genes and a Nuclear Intron in the Asian Pit Viper Genus, Trimeresurus: Separate, Simultaneous, and Conditional Data Combination Analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20, 1240-1251. doi:10.1093/ MOLBEV/MSGI36
9. Damgaard, J., and Cognato, A. I. (2003). Sources of character conflict in a clade of water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Cladistics 19, 512-526. doi:10.1016/J.CLADISTICS.2003.10.001
10. DeSalle, R., and Brower, A. V. Z. (1997). Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: Inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Systematic Biology 46, 751-764.
11. Eernisse, D. J., and Kluge, A. G. (1993). Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 1170-1195.
12. Farris, J. (1989). The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5, 417-419.
13. Farris, J. S. (1990). Phenetics in camouflage. Cladistics 6, 91-100.
14. Farris, J. S., Kallersjö, M., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1994). Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319. doi:10.1006/ CLAD.1994.1021
15. Farris, J. S., Kallersjö, M., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1995). Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44, 570-572.
16. Friedrich, M., and Muqim, N. (2003). Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of the flour beetle Tribolium castanaeum. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 502-513. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(02) 00335-4
17. Gatesy, J., and Arctander, P. (2000). Hidden morphological support for the phylogenetic placement of Pseudoryx nghetinhensis with bovine bovids: A combined analysis of gross anatomical evidence and DNA sequences from five genes. Systematic Biology 49, 515-538.
18. Gatesy, J., O'Grady, P., and Baker, R. H. (1999). Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: Hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level Artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15, 271-313. doi:10.1006/CLAD.1999.0111
19. Gatesy, J., Amato, G., Norell, M., DeSalle, R., and Hayashi, C. (2003). Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. Systematic Biology 52, 403-422.
20. Grant, T., and Kluge, A. G. (2003). Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics 19, 379-418. doi:10.1016/S0748-3007(03)00074-4
21. Johnson, L. A., and Soltis, D. E. (1998) Assessing congruence: Empirical examples from molecular data. In 'Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing'. (Eds D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis and J. J. Doyle.) pp. 297-343. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.)
22. Joy, D. A., and Conn, J. E. (2001). Molecular and morphological phylogenetic analysis of an insular radiation in Pacific black flies (Simulium). Systematic Biology 50, 18-38. doi:10.1080/ 106351501750107431
23. Kallersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1992). Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8, 275-287.
24. Kluge, A. (1989). A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38, 7-25.
25. Kluge, A., and Farris, J. (1969). Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18, 1-32.
26. Lambkin, C. L., and Yeates, D. K. (2003). Genes, morphology, and agreement: Congruence in Australian anthracine bee flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae: Anthracinae). Invertebrate Systematics 17, 161-184. doi:10.1071/1S02039
27. Lambkin, C. L., Lee, M. S. Y., Winterton, S. L., and Yeates, D. K. (2002). Partitioned Bremer support and multiple trees. Cladistics 18, 436-444. doi:10.1016/S0748-3007(02)00003-8
28. Lambkin, C. L., Yeates, D. K., and Greathead, D. J. (2003). An evolutionary radiation of bee flies in semi-arid Australia: systematics of the Exoprosopini (Diptera: Bombyliidae). Invertebrate Systematics 17, 735-891. doi:10.1071/1S03020
29. Larson, A. (1994) The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. In 'Molecular Ecology and Evolution'. (Eds B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. Wagner and R. DeSalle.) pp. 371-390. (Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland.)
30. Larson, A., and Dimmick, W. W. (1993). Phylogenetic relationships of the salamander families: An analysis of congruence among morphological and molecular characters. Herpetological Monograph 7, 77-93.
31. Lee, M. S. Y. (2000). Tree robustness and clade significance. Systematic Biology 49, 829-836. doi:10.1080/106351500750049879
32. Lee, M. S. Y., and Hugall, A. F. (2003). Partitioned likelihood support and the evaluation of data set conflict. Systematic Biology 52, 15-22.
33. Lin, C.-P., and Danforth, B. N. (2004). How do insect nuclear and mitochondrial gene substitution patterns differ? Insights from Bayesian analyses of combined datasets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30, 686-702. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00241-0
34. Mickevich, M., and Farris, J. (1981). The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30, 351-370.
35. Misof, B., and Fleck, G. (2003). Comparative analysis of mt LSU rRNA secondary structures of Odonates: structural variability and phylogenetic signal. Insect Molecular Biology 12, 535-547. doi:10.1046/J.1365-2583.2003. 00432.X
36. Miyamoto, M. M. (1981). Congruence among character sets in phylogenetic studies of the frog genus Leptodactylus. Systematic Zoology 30, 281-290.
37. Miyamoto, M. M. (1985). Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1, 186-189.
38. Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. (1996). On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221-241. doi:10.1006/CLAD.1996.0016
39. Omland, K. E. (1994). Character congruence between a molecular and morphological phylogeny for dabbling ducks (Anas). Systematic Biology 43, 369-386.
40. Poe, S. (1996). Data set incongruence and the phylogeny of crocodilians. Systematic Biology 45, 393-414.
41. Remsen, J., and DeSalle, R. (1998). Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 225-235. doi:10.1006/ MPEV.1997.0484
42. Sorenson, M. D. (1999). 'TreeRot Version 2.' (Sorenson, M. D., Boston University: Boston, MA, USA.)
43. Swofford, D. (1991). When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In 'Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences'. (Eds M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft.) pp. 295-333. (Oxford University Press: New York, USA.)
44. Swofford, D. (2002). 'PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods).' Version 4.0b.10. (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.)
45. Swofford, D., and Begle, D. (1993). 'PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony Version 3.1.1 User's Manual.' (Illinois Natural History Survey: Champaign, IL, USA.)
46. Templeton, A. (1983). Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of Humans and the Apes. Evolution 37, 221-244.
47. Wahlberg, N., and Nylin, S. (2003). Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics 19, 213-223. doi:10.1016/S0748-3007(03) 00027-6
48. Wheeler, W. C., Cartwright, P., and Hayashi, C. Y. (1993). Arthropod phylogeny: A combined approach. Cladistics 9, 1-39. doi:10.1006/CLAD.1993.1001
49. Wiens, J. J. (1998). Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Systematic Biology 47, 568-581. doi:10.1080/ 106351598260581
50. Yeates, D. (1994). Cladistics and classification of the Bombyliidae (Diptera: Asiloidea). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 219, 1-191.