Solving the ultranonlocality problem in time-dependent spin-density-functional theory

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 066402/1-066402/4

  Qian, Z ^a   Constantinescu, A ^a   Vignale, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRONIC DENSITY OF STATES; GROUND STATE; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

ADIABATIC APPROXIMATION; EXCHANGE CORRELATION FIELDS; SPIN CURRENT DENSITY; TIME DEPENDENT SPIN DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ULTRANONLOCALITY PROBLEM;

PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

EID: 5044230071     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.066402     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. R. M. Dreizler and E. K. U. Gross, Density Functional Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).
2. →′ tending to zero.
3. G. Vignale and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2037 (1996).
4. G. Vignale, C. A. Ullrich, and S. Conti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4878 (1997).
5. X. Gonze, Ph. Ghosez, and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4035 (1995).
6. 78, 294 (1997).
7. Ph. Ghosez, X. Gonze, and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12 811 (1997).
8. R. M. Martin and G. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. B 56, 1124 (1997).
9. G. Ortiz, I. Souza, and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 353 (1998).
10. D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3966 (1997).
11. I. V. Tokatly and O. Pankratov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2078 (2001).
12. E. K. U. Gross, J. F. Dobson, and M. Petersilka, in Density Functional Theory II, edited by R. F. Nalewajski, Topics in Current Chemistry (Springer, Berlin, 1996), Vol. 181, p. 81.
13. E. K. U. Gross and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2850 (1985).
14. 57, 923(E) (1986).
15. J. F. Dobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2244 (1994).
16. W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 123, 1242 (1961).
17. P. L. de Boeij, F. Kootstra, J. A. Berger, R. van Leeuwen, and J. G. Snijders, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 1995 (2001).
18. M. van Faassen, P.L. de Boeij, R. van Leeuwen, J. A. Berger, and J. G. Snijders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186401 (2002).
19. B. Goodman and A. Sjölander, Phys. Rev. 8, 200 (1973).
20. K. L. Liu, Can. J. Phys. 69, 573 (1991).
21. C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8170 (1994).
22. I. D'Amico and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4853 (2000).
23. K. L. Liu and S. H. Vosko, Can. J. Phys. 67, 1015 (1989).
24. Remarkably, the singularity does not affect the transverse spin-response discussed in Z. Qian and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 056404 (2002).
25. C. A. Ullrich and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B. 65, 245102 (2002).
26. S. Conti and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7966 (1999).
27. The large ω limit of ImA(ω) at ζ = 0 was also obtained by Liu [15]. However, his assumption that ImA(ω) ∝ ω for ω → 0 is incorrect.
28. P. Gori-Giorgi and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 64, 155102 (2001).
29. N. Iwamoto and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. B 29, 3924 (1984).
30. Z. Qian and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 65, 235121 (2002).
31. This is the spin-dependent generalization of an exact identity first established in the spinless case (see Ref. [20]).