Drawing on the legacy of general practice to build the future of family medicine

Family Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 631-638

  Geyman, John P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FAMILY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SELF EVALUATION;

EID: 5044229843     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Sandy LG, Schroeder SA. Primary care in a new era: disillusion or dissolution? Ann Intern Med 2003;138:262-7.
2. Special dedicated issue: the Keystone papers: formal discussion papers from Keystone III. Fam Med 2001;33(4).
3. Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(1):S1-S32.
4. Curry HB. Phoenix in flight. All systems go! JAMA 1972;222(7):821-6.
5. Margotta R. The story of medicine. New York: Golden Press, 1968:25.
6. Stephens GG. The intellectual basis of family practice. J Fam Pract 1975;2(4):428.
7. McWhinney IR. Family medicine in perspective. N Engl J Med 1975;293(4):180
8. McWhinney IR. Problem solving and decision making in primary medical practice. Can Fam Physician 1972;18(11):111.
9. Geiger HJ. The poor and the professional: who takes the handle off the Broad Street pump? Presented at 94th annual meeting of American Public Health Association, San Francisco, Nov. 1, 1966.
10. Stevens R. Medical practice in modern England: the impact of specialization and state medicine. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1966:13-8.
11. Barnett BL. Between the lines: reflections of a family physician. Kansas City, Mo: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Foundation, 1989:v.
12. Pellegrino ED. The family of medicine, broken or extended? The need for moral cement. J Fam Pract 1984;9:287.
13. McWhinney IR. A textbook of family medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989:364-5.
14. Mair A. Sir James Mackenzie, MD, general practitioner, 1853-1925. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1973.
15. Pickles WN. Epidemiology in country practice. London, Bristol: John Wright & Sons, Ltd, 1939.
16. Medalie JH, Snyder M, Groen JJ. et al. Angina pectoris among 10,000 men. Am J Med 1973;55:583.
17. Medalie JH, Goldbourt U. Angina pectoris among 10,000 men. II. Psychosocial and other risk factors as evidence by a multivariate analysis of a 5-year incidence study. Am J Med 1976;60:910.
18. White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med 1961;265(18):885-92.
19. White KL. Fundamental research at the primary care level. Lancet 2000;355:1904-6.
20. David AK. Necessary change in family medicine: entering adulthood. Fam Med 2003;35(3):217-9.
21. Rose JR. Focus on practice. The declining hospital round. Med Econ 2003;Dec 19:12.
22. Lurie JD, Miller DP, Lindenauer PK, Wachter RM, Sox HC. The potential size of the hospitalist workforce in the United States. Am J Med 1999;106:441-5.
23. Schappert SM. Survey statistician. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md. In: Green LA, Fryer GE. Family practice in the United States: position and prospects. Acad Med 2002;77(8):781-9.
24. No new patients. Policy and practice. Family Practice News 2002;32(19):53.
25. Franks P, Cameron C, Bertakis KD. On being new to an insurance plan: health care use associated with the first years in a health plan. Ann Fam Med 2003;1:156-61.
26. Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med 2003;1:134-43.
27. Brody H. Stories of sickness. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1987;182, 192.
28. Green LA. Putting practice into research. A 20-year perspective. Fam. Med 2000;32(6):394-5.
29. Green LA, Fryer GE. Family practice in the United States: position and prospects. Acad Med 2002;77:787-9.
30. Hames CG, Greenlund KI. Ethnicity and cardiovascular disease: the Evans County Heart Study. Am J Med Sci 1996;311(3):130-4.
31. Lackland DT, Keil TE, Gayes PC, Hames CG, Tyrolen HA. Outcomes of black and white hypertensive individuals after 30 years of follow-up. Clin Exp Hypertens 1995;17(7):1091-105.
32. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002;288:1775-9.
33. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness, the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA 2002;288:1909-14.
34. Williams JW Jr, Rost K, Dietrich AJ, Ciotti MC, Zyzanski SJ, Cornell J. Primary care physicians' approach to depressive disorders: effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Arch Fam Med 1999;8(1): 58-67.
35. DOPC Writing Group. Conducting the direct observation of primary care study. J Fam Pract 2001;50(4):345-52.
36. Terry K. What's on the horizon for primary care? Med Econ 2002;Feb 8:27-31.
37. McPherson DS, Schmittling GT, Pugno PA, Kahn NB Jr. Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 2002-2003 and 3-year summary. Fam Med 2003;35(8):555-63.
38. Hooker RS, McCaig LF. Use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners in primary care, 1995-1999. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(4):231-8.
39. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280:1569-75.
40. Gloor J. New Mexico psychologists gain prescribing privileges. Family Practice Report 2002;8(4):1.
41. Kintisch E. FPs join the fight against psychologist prescribing. Family Practice News 2003;33(3):9.
42. Brunk D. Some alternative treatments covered by Medicaid plans. Family Practice News 2000;Jan 1:44.
43. Peterson A. States grant "herb doctors" new powers. Wall Street Journal 2002;Aug 22:D1.
44. Pharmacists finding solutions through collaboration, volume 2002. Alliance for Pharmaceutical Care, Partners to Improve Health Outcomes. www.accp.com/position/paper10.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2001.
45. Lee TH, Brennan TA. Direct-to-consumer marketing of high-technology screening tests. N Engl J Med 2003;346:529.
46. Practice trends. Cheap drugs for American seniors. Family Practice News 2003;33(8):42.
47. Stephens GG. Family medicine as counterculture. In: Stephens GG, ed. The intellectual basis of family practice. Tucson: Winter Publishing, 1982.
48. Green LA. The view from 2020: how family practice failed. Fam Med 2001;33(4):320-4.
49. Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance. Insuring America's health: principles and recommendations. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press, 2004:140-50.
50. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. National health insurance or incremental reform: aim high or at our feet? Am J Public Health 2003;93(1):31-4.
51. Proposal of the Physicians Working Group for single-payer national health insurance. JAMA 2003;290:798-805.
52. Woolhandler S, Campbell T, Himmelstein DU. Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 2003;349:768-75.
53. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S, Wolk SM. The cost (of health care administration) to the nation, the states, and the District of Columbia, with state-specific estimates of potential savings. Public Citizen, The Health Research Group 2003;Aug 20.
54. Geyman JP. Family practice in a failing health care system: new opportunities to advocate for system reform. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15:407-16.
55. California Health Care Options Project. Preliminary full drafts of each proposal are available at www.healthcareoptions.ca.gov/doclib.asp.
56. Sheils JF, Haught RA. Analysis of the costs and impact of universal health care models for the state of Maryland: the single-payer and multi-payer models. Fairfax, Va: The Lewin Group, 2000.
57. Brand R, Ford D, Sager A, Socolar D. Universal comprehensive coverage: a report to the Massachusetts Medical Society. Waltham, Mass: The Massachusetts Medical Society, 1998.
58. Smith RF. Universal health insurance makes business sense. Rutland Herald 2001;Nov 2.
59. Starfield B. New paradigms for quality in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:303-9.
60. Starfield B. Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
61. Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet 1994;344:1129-33.
62. Shi L, Starfield B, Kennedy B, Kawachi I. Income inequality, primary care, and high indicators. J Fam Pract 1999;45(4):275-84.
63. Parchman M, Culter S. Primary care physicians and avoidable hospitalization. J Fam Pract 1994;39:123-6.
64. The graduate education of physicians. The report of the Citizens Commission of Graduate Medical Education. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1966:40.
65. Education for Family Practice of the Council on Medical Education. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1966:1.
66. Health is a community affair. The Report of the National Commission on Community Health Services. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1966.
67. Frey JJ. GP to FP to GP? Fam Med 2003;35(9):671-2.