Modelling and optimisation of a chemical industry wastewater treatment plant subjected to varying production schedules

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 79, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1084-1091

  Van Hulle, Stijn W H ^a   Vanrolleghem, Peter A ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Activated sludge model; Calibration; Industrial wastewater treatment plant; Model based optimisation; Scenario analysis

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

DISCHARGING FACILITIES; MODEL-BASED OPTIMIZATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS (WWTP);

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; CALIBRATION; MODELING; OPTIMIZATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT;

AERATION; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEGRADATION; EFFLUENT; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; PREDICTION; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REACTOR CASCADE; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

EID: 5044224851     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1085     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bury SJ, Groot CK, Huth C and Hardt N, Dynamic simulations of chemical wastewater treatment plants. Water Science & Technology 45:355-363 (2002).
2. Henze M, Harremoës P, LaCour Jansen J and Arvin E, Wastewater Treatment: Biological and Chemical Processes. Springer, New York (1995).
3. Coen F, Vanderhaegen B, Boonen I, Vanrolleghem PA and Van Meenen P, Nitrogen removal upgrade of a WWTP within existing reactor volumes: a simulation supported scenario analysis. Water Science & Technology 34:339-346 (1996).
4. Petersen B, Gernaey K, Henze M and Vanrolleghem PA, Evaluation of an ASM1 model calibration procedure on a municipal-industrial wastewater treatment plant. Journal of Hydroinformatics 4:15-38 (2002).
5. Henze M, Gujer W, Matsuo T and Van Loosdrecht M, Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, Scientific and Technical Reports. IWA Publishing, London, UK (2000).
6. Vanhooren H, Meirlaen J, Amerlinck Y, Claeys F, Vangheluwe H and Vanrolleghem PA, WEST: Modelling biological wastewater treatment. Journal of Hydroinformatics 5:27-50 (2003).
7. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE Standard Measurement of Oxygen Transfer in Clean Water. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York (1992).
8. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Inc, New York (1992).
9. Vanrolleghem PA and Spanjers H, A hybrid respirometric method for more reliable assessment of activated sludge model. Water Science & Technology 37:237-246 (1998).
10. Ekama GA, Dold PL and Marais GvR, Procedures for determining influent COD fractions and the maximum specific growth rate of heterotrophs in activated sludge systems. Water Science & Technology 18:91-114 (1986).
11. Petersen B, Gernaey K, Henze M and Vanrolleghem PA, Calibration of activated sludge models: a critical review of experimental designs, in Biotechnology for the Environment: Wastewater Treatment and Modeling, Waste Gas Handling, ed by Agathos SN and Reineke W. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 101-186 (2003).
12. Van Hulle SWH and Vanrolleghem PA, Modelling an industrial WWTP using a calibration protocol. Biomath Technical report. Ghent University, Belgium, pp 32 (2002).
13. Froment GF and Bishoff KB, Chemical Reaction Engineering. Wiley, New York (1990).