Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 552-559

  Theodoros, Deborah ^a   Hill, Anne ^a   Russell, Trevor ^a   Ward, Elizabeth ^a   Wootton, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; TESTING;

ASSESSMENT TASKS; EQUITABLE ACCESS; KAPPA STATISTICS; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; ON-LINE ASSESSMENT; ON-LINE ENVIRONMENT; SERVICE DELIVERY; TELE-REHABILITATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES; VIDEO CONFERENCING SYSTEM; VISUAL QUALITIES;

LINGUISTICS;

ADULT; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST; TELECONSULTATION; VALIDITY; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN INJURIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; LANGUAGE TESTS; LANGUAGE THERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 50249168663     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0091     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Duffy JR. Defining, understanding and categorizing motor speech disorders. In: Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2005:3-16.
2. Enderby P, Emerson J. Does speech and language therapy work? London, UK: Whurr Publishers Ltd, 1995.
3. National Stroke Foundation: www.strokefoundation.com.au/pages/Default. aspx?PageID=2&id=1 (Last accessed August 20, 2007).
4. American Heart Association: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2005 Update. www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1105390918119HDSStats2005 Update.pdf (Last accessed August 20, 2007).
5. Brookshire RH. Traumatic brain injury. In Brookshire RH, Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier, 2007:445-530.
6. Kraus JF. Epidemiology of head injury. In Cooper PR, ed. Head injury (3rd edition). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:1-25.
7. Naugle RI. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in adults. In: Bigler ED, ed. Traumatic brain injury: Mechanisms of damage, assessment, intervention, and outcome. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, 1990:69-103.
8. Finlayson MAJ, Garner SH. Challenges in the rehabilitation of individuals with acquired brain injury. In Allen M, Finlayson MAJ, Garner SH, eds. Brain injury rehabilitation: Clinical Considerations. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1994:3-10.
9. Worrall L, Frattali CM. Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach. New York: Thieme, 2000.
10. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004. www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/ abs@.nsf (Last accessed August 20, 2007).
11. Pickering M, McAllister L, Hagler P, Whitehill T, Penn C, Robertson S, McCready V. External factors influencing the profession in six societies. Am J Sp-Lang Pathol 1998;7:5-17.
12. Brennan DM, Georgeadis AC, Baron CR, Barker LM. The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemed J E-Health 2004;10:147-154.
13. Duffy JR, Werven GW, Aronson AE. Telemedicine and diagnosis of speech and language disorders. Mayo Clin Proc 1997;72:1116-1122.
14. Georgeadis AC, Brennan DM, Barker LM, Baron CR. Telerehabilitation and its effects on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiology 2004;18:639-652.
15. Palsbo SE. Equivalence of functional communication assessment in speech pathology using videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13:40-43.
16. Savard L, Borstad A, Tkachuck J, Lauderdale D, Conroy B. Telerehabilitation consultations for clients with neurologic diagnoses: Cases from rural Minnesota and American Samoa. Neurorehabilitation 2003;18:93-102.
17. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (3rd ed). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
18. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test (2nd ed). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
19. Borod JC, Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Normative data on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination and the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Neuropsych 1980;2:209-215.
20. Hayes JM, Pitsenbarger TH. Microsoft NetMeeting 3.0 security assessment and configuration guide. www.governmentsecurity.org/articles/articles2/ms- netmeeting-security-assessment-and-configuration-guide.pdf_fl/ (Last accessed July 11, 2003).
21. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
22. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
23. Biddle A, Watson L, Hooper C, Lohr KN, Sutton SF. Criteria for determining disability in speech-language disorders. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 52. AHRQ publication no. 02-E010. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002.
24. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320:1517-1520.