Understanding User centred design (UCD) for people with special needs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5105 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-17

  Thimbleby, Harold ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOOD PRACTICE; INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; SPECIAL NEEDS; USER CENTRED DESIGN;

EID: 50249156852     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Anderson, J.R., Lebiere, C.: The Atomic Components of Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1998)
2. Beveridge, M., Crerar, A.: A multimedia presentation system for the remediation of sentence processing deficits. In: Proceedings of INTERACT 1999, pp. 272-280 (1999)
3. Buxton, B.: Sketching the user experience. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2007)
4. Cairns, P.: HCI. . . not as it should be: Inferential statistics in HCI research. In: Ball, L.J., Sasse, M.A., Sas, C. (eds.) HCI 2007, vol. 1, pp. 195-201 (2007)
5. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983)
6. Chandrashekar, S., Stockman, T., Fels, D., Benedyk, R.: Using think aloud protocol with blind users: A case for inclusive usability evaluation methods. In: Assets 2006: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 251-252. ACM, New York (2006)
7. Chen, M.K.: Rationalization and cognitive dissonance: Do choices affect or reflect preferences? Technical report, Yale School of Management (2008)
8. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)
9. Gould, J.D., Lewis, C.: Designing for usability - key principles and what designers think. In: CHI 1983: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 50-53. ACM, New York (1983)
10. Gould, J.D., Lewis, C.: Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM 28(3), 300-311 (1985)
11. Gray, W.D., Salzman, M.C.: Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human-Computer Interaction 13(3), 203-261 (1998)
12. Gray, W.D., Salzman, M.C.: Repairing damaged merchandise: A rejoinder. Human-Computer Interaction 13(3), 325-335 (1998)
13. Hansen, W.J.: User engineering principles for interactive systems. In: AFIPS Conference Proceedings, vol. 39, pp. 523-532 (1971)
14. Holzinger, A., Sammer, P., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R.: Mobile computer in medicine: Designing mobile questionairres for elderly and partially sighted people. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 732-739. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
15. Institute for Safe Medication Practice Canada. Fluorouracil Incident Root Cause Analysis (2007), www.cancerboard.ab.ca/NR/rdonlyres/ D92D86F9-9880-4D8A- 819C-281231CA2A38/0/IncidentReportUE.pdf
16. International conference on computers helping people with special needs conference series. LNCS, vol. 2398, 3118, 4061, etc. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
17. John, B.E., Salvucci, D.D.: Multi-purpose prototypes for assessing user interfaces in pervasive computing systems. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4(4), 27-34 (2005)
18. Jokela, T., Lalli, T.: Usability and CMMI: Does a higher maturity level in product development mean better usability? In: CHI 2003 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1010-1011. ACM, New York (2003)
19. Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 1121-1134 (1999)
20. Lacaze, X., Palanque, P., Navarre, D., Bastide, R.: Performance evaluation as a tool for quantitative assessment of complexity of interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Interactive Systems, Design, Specification, and Verification (DSVIS), vol. 2545, pp. 208-222. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
21. Landauer, T.: The Trouble with Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
22. MacKenzie, I.S.: Movement time prediction in human-computer interfaces. In: Baecker, R.M., Buxton, W.A.S., Grudin, J., Greenberg, S. (eds.) Readings in human-computer interaction, pp. 483-493. Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)
23. Newman, W., Sproull, R.: Principles of Interactive Computer Graphics, 2nd edn. Mcgraw-Hill, New York (1979)
24. Nielsen, J.: Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: Proceedings ACM CHI 1992, pp. 373-380 (1992)
25. Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1986)
26. Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., Pavan, P.: Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006, pp. 1133-1141 (2006)
27. Ramey, J., Boren, T., Cuddihy, E., Dumas, J., Guan, Z., van den Haak, M.J., Jong, M.D.T.D.: Does think aloud work? How do we know? In: CHI 2006 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 45-48. ACM, New York (2006)
28. Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)
29. Tavris, C., Aronson, E.: Mistakes were made. Harcourt (2000)
30. Thimbleby, H.: Press On: Principles of interaction programming. MIT Press, Boston (2007)
31. Thimbleby, H.: User-centered methods are insufficient for safety critical systems. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4799, pp. 1-20. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
32. Thimbleby, H., Addison, M.A.: Intelligent adaptive assistance and its automatic generation. Interacting with Computers 8(1), 51-68 (1996)
33. Thimbleby, H., Thimbleby, W.: Internalist and externalist HCI. In: BCS HCI 2007, vol. 2, pp. 111-114 (2007)
34. Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., Polson, P.: The cognitive walkthrough method: A practictioner's guide. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods (1994)
35. Widdup, E.: We told T5 bosses the system was a farce. . . they ignored us. London Evening Standard 9, 17 (2008)
36. Wixon, D.R.: Evaluating usability methods: Why the current literature fails the practitioner. Interactions 10(4), 28-34 (2003)