The method of levels of abstraction

Minds and Machines

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 303-329

  Floridi, Luciano ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abstraction; Gradient of abstraction; Level of abstraction; Levelism; Observable; Stance

Indexed keywords

CLARIFICATION; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

ABSTRACTION; GRADIENT OF ABSTRACTION; LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION; LEVELISM; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION; OBSERVABLE; STANCE;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 50249130726     PISSN: 09246495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11023-008-9113-7     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arbib, M. A. (1989). The metaphorical brain 2: Neural networks and beyond. New York, Chichester: Wiley.
2. Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1987). The liar: An essay on truth and circularity. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Benjamin, P., Erraguntla, M., Delen, D., & Mayer, R. (1998). Simulation modeling and multiple levels of abstraction. In D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson, & M. S. Manivannan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 391-398). Pistacaway, New Jersey: IEEE Press.
5. Block, N. (1997). Anti-reductionism slaps back. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives 11: Mind, causation, and world (pp. 107-133). Oxford, New York: Blackwell.
6. Brown, H. C. (1916). Structural levels in the scientist's world. The Journal of Philosohy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 13(13), 337-345. doi: 10.2307/2012309.
7. Craver, C. F. (2004). A field guide to levels, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 77(3).
8. Craver, C. F. (forthcoming), Explaining the brain: A mechanist's approach.
9. Davidson, D. (1974). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47.
10. (Reprinted in Inquiries into Truth and Representation, pp. 183-198, 1984, Oxford: Clarendon Press. All page numbers to the quotations in the text refer to the reprinted version).
11. de Roever, W.-P., & Engelhardt, K. (1998). Data refinement: Model-oriented proof methods and their comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Dennett, D. C. (1971). Intentional systems. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 87-106. doi: 10.2307/2025382.
13. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
14. Egyed, A., & Medvidovic, N. (2000). A formal approach to heterogeneous software modeling. In T. Mailbaum (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (Fase 2000, Berlin, Germany, March-April)-Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1783. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
15. Feynman, R. P. (1995). Six easy pieces. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Floridi, L. (2003). On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 287-304. doi: 10.1023/A:1021342422699.
17. Floridi, L. (2004a). Information. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 40-61). Oxford, New York: Blackwell.
18. Floridi, L. (2004b). The informational approach to structural realism. final draft available as IEG-Research Report 22.11.04, http://www.wolfson.ox.ac. uk/~floridi/pdf/latmoa.pdf.
19. Floridi, L. (2004c). On the logical unsolvability of the gettier problem. Synthese, 142(1), 61-79. doi: 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000047709.27594.c4.
20. Floridi, L. (2005a). Consciousness, agents and the knowledge game. Minds and Machines, 15(3-4), 415-444. doi: 10.1007/s11023-005-9005-z.
21. Floridi, L. (2005b). Presence: From epistemic failure to successful observability. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(6), 656-667. doi: 10.1162/105474605775196553.
22. Floridi, L. (forthcoming-a). Information ethics: Its nature and scope. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Moral philosophy and information technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Floridi, L. (forthcoming-b). Levels of abstraction: From computer science to philosophy, Journal of Applied Logic.
24. Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004a). The method of abstraction. In M. Negrotti (Ed.), Yearbook of the artificial-nature, culture and technology, models in contemporary sciences (pp. 177-220). Bern: Peter Lang.
25. Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004b). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349-379. doi: 10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461. 63578.9d.
26. Foster, C. L. (1992). Algorithms, abstraction and implementation: Levels of detail in cognitive science. London: Academic Press.
27. Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. London: Little Brown.
28. Hales, S. D., & Welshon, R. (2000). Nietzsche's perspectivism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29. Hayes, I., & Flinn, B. (1993). Specification case studies (2nd ed.). New York, London: Prentice Hall.
30. Heil, J. (2003). Levels of reality. Ratio, 16(3), 205-221. doi: 10.1111/1467-9329.00218.
31. Hoare, C. A. R., & He, J. (1998). Unifying theories of programming. London: Prentice Hall.
32. Hughes, P., & Brecht, G. (1976). Vicious circles and infinity: A panoply of paradoxes. London: Cape. Originally published: Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1975.
33. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason repr. w. corr. (trans: Guyer, P., & Wood, A. W., Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
35. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
36. McClamrock, R. (1991). Marr's three levels: A re-evaluation. Minds and Machines, 1, 185-196. doi: 10.1007/BF00361036.
37. Mesarovic, M. D., Macko, D., & Takahara, Y. (1970). Theory of hierarchical, multilevel, systems. New York: Academic Press.
38. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435-450. doi: 10.2307/2183914.
39. Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87-127. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(82)90012-1.
40. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.
41. Newell, A. (1993). Reflections on the knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 59, 31-38. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(93)90166-9.
42. Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). The unity of science as a working hypothesis. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (Vol. 2, pp. 3-36). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43. Poli, R. (2001). The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes, 12, 261-283. doi: 10.1023/A:1015845217681.
44. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Robinson, J. (1989). Vintage timecharts: The pedigree and performance of fine wines to the year 2000. London: Mitchell Beazley.
46. Russell, B. (1902). Letter to Frege. In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.), From frege to gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879-1931 (pp. 124-125). Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1967.
47. Salthe, S. N. (1985). Evolving hierarchical systems: Their structure and representation. New York: Columbia University Press.
48. Schaffer, J. (2003). Is there a fundamental level? Nous, 37(3), 498-517. doi: 10.1111/1468-0068.00448.
49. Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press. (The text was based on the Karl Taylor Compton lectures, 1968).
50. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
51. Spivey, J. M. (1992). The Z notation: A reference manual (2nd ed.). New York, London: Prentice-Hall.
52. Tarski, A. (1944). The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and phenomenological research, 4, (pp. 341-376).
53. (Reprinted in Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, by L. Linsky, Ed., 1952, Urbana: University of Illinois Press).
54. Wimsatt, W. C. (1976). Reductionism, levels of organization and the mind-body problem. In G. Globus, G. Maxwell, & I. Savodnik (Eds.), Consciousness and the brain (pp. 199-267). New York: Plenum.