Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: An empirical evaluation

MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 553-573

  Shanks, Graeme ^a   Tansley, Elizabeth ^b   Nuredini, Jasmina ^c   Tobin, Daniel ^a   Weber, Ron ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Simsion and Associates   (Australia)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Composition; Conceptual modeling; Information systems development; Mereology; Mereotopology; Meronymic relations; Ontology; Part of relations

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; MEREOLOGY; MEREOTOPOLOGY; MERONYMIC RELATIONS; PART-OF RELATIONS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 50249120722     PISSN: 02767783     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/25148856     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Artale, A., Franconi, E., Guarino, and N. Pazzi, L. 1996. "Part-Whole Relations in Object-Centered Systems: An Overview," Data & Knowledge Engineering (20:3), pp. 347-383.
2. Batra, D., Hoffer, J. A., and Bostrom, R. P. 1990. "Comparing Representations with Relational and EER Models," Communications of the ACM(33:2), pp. 126-139.
3. Biederman, I. 1987. "Recognition by Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding, " Psychological Review(94:2), pp. 115-145.
4. Bloom, B. S. (ed.). 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, New York: Longmans.
5. Bodart, F., Sim, M., Patel, A., and Weber, R. 2001. "Should Optional Properties Be Used In Conceptual Modeling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests," Information Systems Research (12:4), pp. 384-405.
6. th International Conference on Information Systems, R. Agarwal, L. J. Kirsch, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Washington, DC, December, pp. 77-90.
7. th ed.), Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
8. Bunge, M. 1977. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 3: Ontology 1: The Furniture of the World, Boston: Reidel.
9. Burton-Jones, A., and Meso, P. 2006. "Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis," Information Systems Research (17:1), pp. 38-60.
10. Burton-Jones, A., Wand, Y., and Weber, R. 2007. "Information Equivalence, Computational Equivalence, and the Evaluation of Conceptual Modeling," in Proceedings of the Sixth AIS SIGSAND Symposium on Research in Systems Analysis and Design, Dinesh Batra (ed.), Tulsa, OK, May, pp. 35-42.
11. Chen, P. P. S. 1976. "The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems (1:1), pp. 9-36.
12. Cohen, J. 1960. "A Coefficient for Agreement of Nominal Scales," Educational and Psychological Measurement (20), pp. 37-46.
13. Davis, F. D. 1989. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly(13:3), pp. 319-340.
14. Dretske, F. 1995. Naturalizing the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Edelman, S. 1999. Representation and Recognition in Vision, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. th ed.), Boston: Pearson/Addison-Wesley.
17. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. 1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (rev. ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Eriksson, H-E., and Penker, M. 1998. UML Toolkit, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Floyd, C. A. 1986. "Comparative Evaluation of System Development Methods," in Information System Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice, T. W. Olle, H. G. Sol, and A. A. Verrijn-Stuart (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp 19-54.
20. Frankel, D. S., and Parodi, J. (eds.). 2004. The MDA Journal: Straight from the Masters, Tampa, FL: Megan-Kiffer Press.
21. Gemino, A., and Wand, Y. 2005. "Complexity and Clarity in Conceptual Modeling: Comparison of Mandatory and Optional Properties," Data & Knowledge Engineering (55:3), pp. 301-326.
22. Gerstl, P., and Pribbenow, S. 1996. "A Conceptual Theory of Part-Whole Relations and Its Applications," Data & Knowledge Engineering (20:3), pp. 305-322.
23. Green, P., and Rosemann, M. 2000. "Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation," Information Systems (25:2), pp. 73-87.
24. Gregor, S. 2006. "The Nature of Theory in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly (30:3), pp. 611-642.
25. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H., and Lyytinen, K. 1995. Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual Foundations and Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
27. Mayer, R.E. 1989. "Models for Understanding, " Review of Educational Research (59:1), pp. 43-64.
28. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research (2:3), pp. 192-222.
29. Olle T. W, Sol, H.G., and Tully, C. J. (eds.). 1983. Information System Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Opdahl, A. L., and Henderson-Sellers, B. 2001. "Grounding the OML Metamodel in Ontology," Journal of Systems and Software (57:2), pp. 119-143.
31. Opdahl, A. L., Henderson-Sellers, B., and Barbier, F. 2001. "Ontological Analysis of Whole-Part Relationships in OO Models," Information and Software Technology (43:6), pp. 387-399.
32. Palmer, S. E. 1978 "Fundamental Aspects of Cognitive Representation," in Cognition and Categorization, E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 259-303.
33. Parsons, J. 1996. "An Information Model Based On Classification Theory," Management Science (42:10), pp. 1437-1453.
34. Parsons, J., and Cole, L. 2005. "What Do the Pictures Mean? Guidelines for Experimental Evaluation of Representation Fidelity in Diagrammatical Conceptual Modeling Techniques," Data & Knowledge Engineering (55:3), pp. 301-326.
35. Parsons, J., and Wand. Y. 2000. "Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Classes in Information Modeling," ACM Transactions on Database Systems (25:2), pp. 228-268.
36. Prietula, M. J., and March, S. T. 1991. "Form and Substance in Physical Database Design: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research (2:3), pp. 287-314.
37. nd ed.), Boston: Addison-Wesley.
38. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., and Weber, R. 2003. "Using Ontology to Validate Conceptual Models," Communications of the ACM (46:10), pp. 85-89.
39. Shoval, P., and Frumerman, F. 1994. "OO and EER Conceptual Schemas: A Comparison of User Comprehension," Journal of Database Management (5:4), pp. 28-38.
40. Shoval, P., and Shiran, S. 1997. "Entity-Relationship and Object-Oriented Modeling: An Experimental Comparison of Design Quality," Data & Knowledge Engineering (21:3), pp. 297-315.
41. Siau, K., Wand, Y., and Benbasat, I. 1997. "The Relative Importance of Structural Constraints and Surface Semantics in Information Modeling," Information Systems (22:2-3), pp. 155-170.
42. Simons, P. M. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
43. Simons, P. M., and Dement, C. W. 1996. "Aspects of the Mereology of Artifacts," in Formal Ontology, R. Poli and P. M. Simons (eds.), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 255-276.
44. Smith, B. 1996. "Mereotopology: A Theory of Parts and Boundaries," Data & Knowledge Engineering (20:3), pp. 287-303.
45. Smith, J. M., and Smith, D. C. P. 1997. "Database Abstractions: Aggregation," Communications of the ACM(20:6), pp. 405-413.
46. Storey, V. 1991. "Meronymic Relationships," Journal of Database Administration (2:3), pp. 22-35.
47. rd ed.), New York: HarperCollins.
48. th ed.), San Francisco: Morgan KaufmannPublishers.
49. Teorey, T. J., Yang, D., and Fry, J. P. 1986. "A Logical Design Methodology for Relational Databases Using the Extended Entity-Relationship Model," ACM Computing Surveys (18:2), pp. 197-222.
50. Varzi, A.C. 1996. "Parts, Wholes, and Part-Whole Relations: The Prospects of Mereotopology," Data & Knowledge Engineering (20:3), pp. 259-286.
51. Voss, J. F., and Post, T. A. 1988. "On the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems" in The Nature of Expertise, M. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M. J. Farr (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 261-285.
52. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. 1993. "On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars," Journal of Information Systems (3:4), pp. 217-237.
53. Wand, Y., and Weber, R. 2002. "Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling: A Research Agenda, " Information Systems Research (13:4), pp. 363-376.
54. Wand, Y., Storey, V., and Weber, R. 1999. "An Ontological Analysis of the Relationship Construct in Conceptual Modeling, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems (24:4), pp. 494-528.
55. Weber, R. 1996. "Are Attributes Entities? A Study of Database Designers' Memory Structures," Information Systems Research (7:2), pp. 137-162.
56. Winston, M. E.Xhaffin, R., and Herrman, D. 1987. "A Taxonomy of Part-whole Relations," Cognitive Science (11:4), pp.417-444.