Modeling languages study and evaluation techniques

Proceedings - 2nd Asia International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, AMS 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 553-558

  Kamandi, Ali ^a   Habibi, Jafar ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA PARTICLE SPECTROMETERS; ASSET MANAGEMENT; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; COMPUTERS; FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LINGUISTICS; PARTICLE SPECTROMETERS;

COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY; COGNITIVE SCIENCES; HUMAN LANGUAGES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; MODELING LANGUAGES; MODELLING AND SIMULATION; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE MODELING LANGUAGES;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 50249111580     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AMS.2008.121     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Card, S. K. T. P. Moran, and A. Newell, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
2. Crandall, B., G. Klein, and R. Hoffman, Working minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis, MIT Press, 2006.
3. J. Erickson, and K. Siau, "Can UML Be Simplified? Practitioner Use of UML in Separate Domains", In Proc. of the Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'07), 2007, pp. 87-96.
4. K. A. Ericsson, and H. A. Simon, "Verbal reports on thinking", In C. Faerch and G. Kasper (eds.): Introspection in Second Language Research, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 1987, pp. 24-54.
5. Ericsson, K. A., and H. A. Simon, Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Revised edition), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
6. T. R. G. Green, "Cognitive dimensions of notations", In A. Sutcliffe and L Macaulay (eds.), People and Computers V, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 443-460.
7. T. R. G. Green, and M. Petre, "Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a cognitive dimensions framework", Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7, 1996, pp. 131-174.
8. S. G. Hart, and L. E. Staveland, "Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research", In Hancock, P. A., Meshkati, N. (eds.), Human Mental Workload, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988, pp. 139-183.
9. R. J. K. Jacob and K. S. Kam, "Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises", In R. Radach, J. Hyona, and H. Deubel (eds.), The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, Boston: North-Holland/Elsevier, 2003, pp. 573-605.
10. B. E. John, and D. E. Kieras, "The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast", ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 3 (4), 1996, pp. 320-351.
11. A. J. Ko, and B. A. Myers, "A framework and methodology for studying the cause of software errors in programming systems", Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 16, 2005, pp. 41-84.
12. th Workshop of the psychology of programming interest group, 2002, pp. 1-14.
13. L. Le Bigot, E. Jamet, J. Rouet, "Searching information with a natural language dialogue system: a comparison of spoken vs. written modalities", Applied Ergonomics 35, 2004, pp. 557-564.
14. E. Lindgren, and K. P. H. Sullivan, "Analyzing online revision", In K.P.H. Sullivan and E. Lindgren (Vol. eds.), Studies in writing, computer keystroke-logging and writing: Methods and applications, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 157-188.
15. M. Matera, F. Rizzo, and G. T. Carughi, "Web usability: principles and evaluation methods", chapter in Web Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 143-180.
16. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, Chestnut Hill, MA: AP Professional Press, 1993.
17. M. C. Otero, and J. J. Dolado, "An empirical comparison of the dynamic modeling in OML and UML", The Journal of Systems and Software 77, 2005, pp. 91-102.
18. R. F. Paige, J. S. Ostroff, and P. J. Brooke, "Principles for modeling language design", Information and Software Technology 42, 2000, pp. 665-675.
19. P. G. Poison, C. Lewis, J. Rieman, and C. Wharton, "Cognitive walkthroughs: method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces", International Journal of Man-Machine. Studies 36, 1992, pp. 741-773.
20. I. Reinhartz-Berger, D. Dori, "OPM vs. UML: Experimenting with Comprehension and Construction of Web Application Models", Empirical Software Engineering 10 (Springer), 2005, pp. 57-79
21. K. Siau, and Y. Tian, "The complexity of Unified Modeling Language: A GOMS analysis", 22 international conference on Infromation Systems, 2001, pp. 443-448.
22. K. Siau, and L. Lee, "Are use case and class diagrams complementary in requirements analysis? An experimental study on use case and class diagrams in UML", Requirements Eng. 9, 2004, pp. 229-237.
23. D. I. K. Sjoberg, T. Dyba, and M. Jorgensen, "The future of empirical methods in software engineering research", Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07), 2007, pp. 358-378.
24. M. Stevenson, R. Schoonen, K. de Glopper, "Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L; and FL". Journal of Second Language Writing 15, 2006, pp. 201-233.
25. J. Sweller, and P. Chandler, "Why some material is difficult to learn", Cognition and Instruction 12, 1994, pp. 185-233.
26. H. Thorson, "Using the computer to compare foreign and native language writing processes: A statistical and case study approach", Modern Language Journal 84(ii), 2000, pp. 155-170.
27. Walden, K., and J. Nerson, Seamless Object-Oriented Software Architecture, Prentice-Hall, 1995.
28. M. G. Williams, and N. Buehler, "Comparison of visual and textual languages via task modeling". Int. Journal Human-Computer Studies 51, 1999, pp. 89-115.
29. S. Yusuf, H. Kagedi, and J. I. Maletic, "Assessing the comprehension of UML Class Diagrams via Eye Tracking", Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, 2007, pp. 113-122.
30. A. Zendler, T. Pfeiffer, M. Eicks and F. Lehner, "Experimental comparison of coarse-grained concepts in UML, OML and TOS", Journal of Systems and Softwares 57 (1), 2001, pp. 21-30.