A novel supermatrix approach improves resolution of phylogenetic relationships in a comprehensive sample of danthonioid grasses

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1106-1119

  Pirie, Michael D ^a   Humphreys, Aelys M ^a   Galley, Chloe ^a   Barker, Nigel P ^b   Verboom, G Anthony ^c   Orlovich, David ^d   Draffin, Suzy J ^d   Lloyd, Kelvin ^e   Baeza, C Marcelo ^f   Negritto, Maria ^f   Ruiz, Eduardo ^f   Sanchez, J Hugo Cota ^g   Reimer, Elizabeth ^g   Linder, H Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b RHODES UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^e LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coding and non coding DNA sequence data; Conflict; Danthonioideae; Missing data; Phylogeny reconstruction; Poaceae; Sampling strategy; Supermatrix

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PLANT DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; CHEMISTRY; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DANTHONIOIDEAE; POACEAE;

EID: 50249091520     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bakker F.T., Hellbrügge D., Culham A., and Gibby M. Phylogenetic relationships within Pelargonium sect. Peristera (Geraniaceae), inferred from nrDNA and cpDNA sequence comparisons. Plant Sys. Evol. 211 (1998) 273-287
2. Barker N.P. A systematic study of the genus Pseudopentameris (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). Bothalia 25 (1995) 141-148
3. Barker N.P., Galley C., Verboom G.A., Mafa P., Gilbert M., and Linder H.P. The phylogeny of the austral grass subfamily Danthonioideae: evidence from multiple data sets. Plant Syst. Evol. 264 (2007) 135-156
4. Barker N.P., Linder H.P., and Harley E.H. Polyphyly of Arundinoideae (Poaceae): evidence from rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 20 (1995) 423-435
5. Barker N.P., Linder H.P., and Harley E.H. Sequences of the grass-specific insert in the chloroplast rpoC2 gene elucidate generic relationships of the Arundinoideae (Poaceae). Syst. Bot. 23 (1999) 327-350
6. Barker N.P., Linder H.P., Morton C.M., and Lyle M. The paraphyly of Cortaderia (Danthonioideae; Poaceae): evidence from morphology and chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 90 (2003) 1-24
7. Barker N.P., Morton C.M., and Linder H.P. The Danthonieae: generic composition and relationships. In: Jacobs S.W.L., and Everett J. (Eds). Grasses: Systematics and Evolution (2000), CSIRO, Melbourne 221-230
8. Baum D.A., Small R.L., and Wendel J.F. Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 181-207
9. Bouchenak-Khelladi Y., Salamin N., Savolainen V., Forest F., Bank M.V.D., Chase M.W., and Hodkinson T.R. Large multi-gene phylogenetic trees of the grasses (Poaceae): Progress towards complete tribal and generic level sampling. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 47 (2008) 488-505
10. Bremer B., Jansen R.K., Oxelman B., Backlund M., Lantz H., and Kim K.-J. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family. Syst. Biol. 48 (1999) 413-435
11. Bull J.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Cunningham C.W., Swofford D.L., and Waddell P.J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 384-397
12. Conert H.J. Merxmuellera, eine neue Gattung der Gramineen. Senckenbergiana Biol. 51 (1970) 129-133
13. de Queiroz A., Donoghue M.J., and Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26 (1995) 657-681
14. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies (2004), Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA
15. Fitch W.M. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specified tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20 (1971) 406-416
16. Flynn J., Finarelli J., Zehr S., Hsu J., and Nedbal M. Molecular phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 317
17. Galley C., and Linder H.P. The phylogeny of the Pentaschistis clade (Danthonioideae, Poaceae) based on chloroplast DNA, and the evolution and loss of complex characters. Evolution 61 (2007) 864-884
18. Gatesy J., Matthee C., DeSalle R., and Hayashi C. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 652-664
19. GPWG. Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88 (2001) 373-457
20. Hardy C.R., and Linder H.P. Intraspecific variability and timing in ancestral ecology reconstruction: a test case from the Cape flora. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 299-316
21. Hilu K.W., Alice L.A., and Liang H. Phylogeny of Poaceae inferred from matK sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86 (1999) 835-851
22. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Ronquist F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 754-755
23. Hughes C., Eastwood R., and Donovan Bailey C. Review. From famine to feast? Selecting nuclear DNA sequence loci for plant species-level phylogeny reconstruction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361 (2006) 211-225
24. Kellogg E.A., Appels R., and Mason-Gamer R.J. When genes tell different stories: the diploid genera of Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21 (1996) 321-347
25. Kim K.-J., and Jansen R.K. ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (1995) 10379-10383
26. Kuzoff R.K., Sweere J.A., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., and Zimmer E.A. The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15 (1998) 251-263
27. Linder H.P., and Barker N.P. From Nees to now - changing questions in the systematics of the grass subfamily Danthonioideae. Nova. Acta Leopoldina 92 (2005) 29-44
28. Linder H.P., and Davidse G. The systematics of Tribolium Desv. Danthonieae: Poaceae). (Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 119 (1997) 445-507
29. Linder H.P., and Verboom G.A. Generic limits in the Rytidosperma (Danthonieae, Poaceae) complex. Telopea 6 (1996) 597-627
30. Maddison D.R., and Maddison W.P. MacClade. Version 3 (2005), Sinaur Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
31. Moline P.M., and Linder H.P. Molecular phylogeny and generic delimitation in the Elegia group (Restionaceae, South Africa) based on a complete taxon sampling and four chloroplast DNA regions. Syst. Bot. 30 (2005) 759-772
32. Muellner A.N., Samuel R., Johnson S.A., Cheek M., Pennington T.D., and Chase M.W. Molecular phylogenetics of Meliaceae (Sapindales) based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 90 (2003) 471-480
33. Muller, K., 2006. SeqState, version 1.32. available from: http://www.botanik.uni-bonn.de/system/downloads/SeqStatus.
34. Nixon K.C. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15 (1999) 407-414
35. Nixon K.C., and Carpenter J.M. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12 (1996) 221-241
36. Olmstead R.G., and Sweere J.A. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43 (1994) 467-481
37. Pisani D., and Wilkinson M. Matrix representation with parsimony, taxonomic congruence, and total evidence. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 151
38. Posada D., and Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 817-818
39. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2003. Tracer v. 1.3, Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
40. Richardson J.E., Pennington R.T., Pennington T.D., and Hollingsworth P.M. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of Neotropical rainforest trees. Science 293 (2001) 2242-2245
41. Rokas A., and Carroll S.B. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 1337-1344
42. Rosenberg M.S., and Kumar S. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 10751-10756
43. Rydin C., and Kallersjö M. Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny. Cladistics 18 (2002) 485
44. Sánchez-Ken J.G., Clark L.G., Kellogg E.A., and Kay E.E. Reinstatement and emendation of subfamily Micrairoideae (Poaceae). Syst. Bot. 32 (2007) 71-80
45. Sanderson M.J., Purvis A., and Henze C. Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 (1998) 105-109
46. * implementation of the parsimony ratchet version 1, beta. Distributed by the authors. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (2001), University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
47. Simmons M.P., and Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 369-381
48. Suzuki Y., Glazko G.V., and Nei M. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 16138-16143
49. *and other methods). Sinauer.
50. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G., and Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of the three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17 (1991) 1105-1109
51. Verboom G.A., Linder H.P., and Barker N.P. Haustorial synergids: an important character in the systematics of danthonoid grasses (Arundinoideae: Poaceae)?. Am. J. Bot. 81 (1994) 1601-1610
52. Verboom G.A., Ntsohi R., and Barker N.P. Molecular phylogeny of African Rytidosperma-affiliated danthonioid grasses reveals generic polyphyly and convergent evolution in spikelet morphology. Taxon 55 (2006) 337-348
53. Vriesendorp B., and Bakker F.T. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in angiosperms: what can we do?. Taxon 54 (2005) 593-604
54. Wiens J.J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 528-538
55. Wiens J.J. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analysis. J. Biomed. Inform 39 (2006) 34-42
56. Wiens J.J., Fetzner J.W., Parkinson C.L., and Reeder T.W. Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 719-748
57. Wilkinson M. Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44 (1995) 501-514
58. Zwickl D.J., and Hillis D.M. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 588-598