Evaluation of unmeshed and 1:1 meshed AlloDerm bolsters for stapled rectal anastomoses in a porcine model

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 616-625

  Stewart, David ^a   Perrone, Juan ^b   Pierce, Richard ^a   Starcher, Barry ^c   Mao, Dongli ^a   Frisella, Margaret ^a   Cook, Kathryn ^a   Fleshman, James ^a   Hunt, Steve ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; DESMOSINE; ELASTIN; HYDROXYPROLINE; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE;

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DOMESTIC PIG; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY; RECTUM ANASTOMOSIS; SAFETY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; ZYMOGRAPHY;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; COLLAGEN; ELASTIN; FEMALE; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECTUM; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SUTURES; SWINE;

EID: 50149113573     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2007.0141     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pickleman J, Watson W, Cunningham J, Fisher SG, Gamelli R. The failed gastrointestinal anastomosis: An inevitable catastrophe? J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:473-482.
2. Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal anastomosis. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;18:244-248.
3. Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Reymond MA, Reck T, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Barlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: Risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc 1999;13:639-644.
4. Franklin ME., Berghoff KE, Arellano PP, et al. Safety and efficacy of the use of bioabsorbable Seamguard in colorectal surgery at the Texas Endosurgery Institute. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005;15:9-13.
5. Feinberg SM, Parker F, Cohen Z. The double-stapling technique for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:885-890.
6. Miller K, Moritz E. Circular stapling techniques for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43:823-831.
7. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355-358.
8. Laxamana A, Solomon MJ, Cohen Z. Long-term results of anterior resection using double-stapling technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1246-1250.
9. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001;88:1157-1168.
10. Alberts JCJ, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ. Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorect Dis 2003;5:478-482.
11. Koperna Thomas. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 2003;138:1334-1338.
12. Branagan G, Finnis, D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021-1026.
13. Walker KG, Bell S, Rickard MJFK, et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240: 255-259.
14. Kusunoki M, Ikeuchi H, Yanagi H, et al. A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn's disease. Dig Surg 1998;15:679-682.
15. Yamamoto T, Bain IM, Mylonakis E, et al. Stapled function end-to-end anastomosis versus sutured end-to-end anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:708-713.
16. Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, et al. A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:489-493.
17. Beart RW, Kelly KA, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surgery 1981; 141:143-147.
18. Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, et al. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses on colorectal surgery. The West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 1995;221:176-184.
19. Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, et al. Direct comparison between Czerny-Lembert and circular-stapled anastomotic techniques in colorectal anastomosis: A similar pattern of healing for both. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:862-869.
20. Ceraldi CM, Rypins EB, Monahan M, et al. Comparison of continuous single layer polypropylene anastomoses with double layer and stapled anastomoses in elective colon resections. Am Surg 1993;59:168-171.
21. Beart RW, Kelly KA. Randomized, prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981;141:143-147.
22. Senagore A, Milsom J, Walshaw R, et al. Direct comparison between Czerny-Lembert and circular-stapled anastomotic techniques in colorectal anastomosis: A similar pattern of healing for both. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:862-869.
23. Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah A, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Sao Paulo Med J 2002;120:132-136.