A Preference-based Interpretation of Other Agents' Actions

Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, KR 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 644-653

  Lang, Jérôme ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; OPTIMAL PLAN; PREFERENCE RELATION; PREFERENCE-BASED;

EID: 50149112173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Brafman, R., and Tennenholtz, M. 1997. Modeling agents as qualitative decision makers. Artificial Intelligence 94.
2. Davison, B. D., and Hirsh, H. 1998. Predicting sequences of user actions. In Proceedings of the 1998 AAAI/ICML Workshop “Predicting the Future: AI Approaches to Time Series Analysis”.
3. Doyle, J., and Wellman, M. P. 1991. Preferential semantics for goals. In Proceedings of AAAI-91, 698-703.
4. Gorniak, P., and Poole, D. 2000. Predicting future user actions by observing unmodified assumptions. In Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000).
5. Hong, J. 2001. Goal recognition through goal graph analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 15:1-30.
6. Isozaki, H., and Katsuno, H. 1996. A semantic characterization of an algorithm for estimating others' beliefs from observation. In Proceedings of AAAI-96, 543-549.
7. Kautz, H., and Allen, J. 1986. Generalized plan recognition. In Proceedings of AAAI-86, 32-37.
8. Levesque, H. 2001. Talk given at MFI-01 (Toulouse, May 2001).
9. Lin, F. 1998. On measuring plan quality (a preliminary report). In Proceedings of KR'98, 224-232.
10. Pollack, M. E. 1990. Plans as complex mental attitudes. In Cohen, P. R.; Morgan, J.; and Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication. MIT Press.