Current practices in measuring ontological concept similarity

3rd International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge, and Grid, SKG 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 266-269

  Le, Duy Ngan ^a   Goh, Angela Eck Soong ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT SIMILARITY; CURRENT PRACTICES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY;

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION THEORY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 50149102170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SKG.2007.16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Benatallah, B.; Hacid, M.-S.; Leger, A., et al., On automating Web services discovery, The VLDB Journal - The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, (2005) 14, 1, 84 1066-8888, Springer-Verlag New York.
2. Cardoso, J.; Sheth, A., Semantic e-Workflow Composition, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, (2003) 21, 3, 191 0925-9902, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Castillo, J. G.; Trastour, D.; Bartolini, C., (2001), Desctiption Logics for Matchmaking of Services, Paper presented at the Workshop on Application of Description Logic,
4. Doan, A. H.; Madhavan, J.; Dahamankar, R., et al., Learning to match Ontologies on the semantic web, The VLDB Journal, (2003) 12, 4, 303 1066-8888, Springer-Verlag New York.
5. Doan, A. H.; Madhavan, J.; Domingos, P., et al., Ontologies Matching: A Machine Learning Approach, In Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, S.Staab; Studer, R. Eds.; Springer-Velag: (2003).
6. Ehrig, M.; Sure, Y., (2004), Ontology Mapping - an integrated approach, 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, Heraklion, Greece,
7. Gruber, T. R., A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, Academic Press: (1993).
8. Haarslev, V.; Möller, R., (2001), RACER System Description, the First International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, Springer-Verlag: London, UK, 2083, 701 3-540-42254-4,
9. Li, L.; Horrocks, I., (2003), A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology, 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary, ACM Press, 331, 1-58113-680-3,
10. M.C.Jaeger; Tang, S.; Liebetruth, C., The TUB OWL-S Matcher.Available at: http://ivs.tuberlin.de/Projekte/owlsmatcher/index.html.
11. Ngan, L. D.; Hang, T. M.; Goh, A., (2006), Semantic Similarity between Concepts from Different OWL Ontologies, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Singapore,
12. Oundhankar, S.; Verma, K.; Sivashanugam, K., et al., Discovery of web serivces in a Muti-Ontologies and Federated Registry Environment, International Journal of Web Services Research, (2005) 1, 3,
13. Paolucci, M.; Kawamura, T.; Payne, T. R., et al., (2002), Semantic Matching of Web services Capabilities, 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2002), Sardinia, Italy, 333,
14. Rijsbergen, K. V., Information Retrieval, Butterworths: London, (1979).
15. Rodriguez, M. A.; Egenhfer, M. J., Determining Semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, (2003) 15, 2, 442 1041-4347,
16. Said, M. P.; Matono, A.; Kojima, I., (2006), SPARQL-based OWL-S Service Matchmaking, SMR 2006 - 1st International Workshop on Semantic Matchmaking and Resource Retrieval: Issues and Perspectives, Seoul, Korea, on-line proceedings of CEUR-WS, 178,
17. Wu, Z.; Palmer, M., (1994), Verbs semantics and lexical selection, 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Association for Computational Linguistics Morristown, NJ, USA, 133