Comparison of fusion methods for successive declarations of radar range profiles

2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Bieker, T ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR HIGH FREQUENCY PHYSICS AND RADAR TECHNIQUES FHR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayes fusion; Evidential reasoning; Target identification; Voting fusion

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA FUSION; FUSION REACTIONS; INFORMATION FUSION; PROBABILITY; RADAR; SENSOR DATA FUSION;

BAYES FUSION; BAYESIAN FUSION; DEMPSTER-SHAFER; EVIDENTIAL REASONING; FUSION METHODS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; NON-COOPERATIVE TARGET IDENTIFICATION; NON-PROBABILISTIC METHODS; PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES; RANGE PROFILING; RELIABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS; TARGET IDENTIFICATION; VOTING FUSION;

NUCLEAR PHYSICS;

EID: 50149095597     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIF.2006.301622     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. F. Dommermuth, Target Classification Using Radar Range Profiles, Frequenz 50 (7-8): 157-164, 1996.
2. D. M. Buede, P. Girardi, A Target Identification Comparison of Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer Multisensor Fusion, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern, 27(5): 569-577, 1997.
3. E. Seidenberg, Improvement of Confidence on Sequential HRR-Measurements, NATO RTO Symposium on High-Range Resolution Radar Techniques, Granada, Reference No. 28, 1999.
4. D. L. Hall, S. A. H. McMullen, Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion, 2nd edition, Artech House, Norwood 2004.
5. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA. 1988.
6. D. V. Lindley, Making Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1975.
7. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1997.
8. A. P. Dempster, A Generalization of Bayesian Inference, J. Royal Statist, Soc. B, 30(2): 205-247, 1968.