Mathematical modelling of influence functions in computer-controlled polishing: Part II

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2907-2924

  Schinhaerl, Markus ^a,b   Smith, Gordon ^b   Stamp, Richard ^b   Rascher, Rolf ^a   Smith, Lyndon ^b   Pitschke, Elmar ^a,b   Sperber, Peter ^a   Geiss, Andreas ^a  

^a DEGGENDORF INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artificial influence function; Computer controlled polishing; Magnetorheological finishing; Preston's law

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FACILITIES; FUNCTION EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATLAB; METHOD OF MOMENTS; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECTS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; SUBSIDENCE;

ARTIFICIAL INFLUENCE FUNCTION; COMPUTER-CONTROLLED POLISHING; ECONOMICAL PRODUCTION; FAST COMPUTATIONS; HIGH-QUALITY; INFLUENCE FUNCTION; INFLUENCE FUNCTIONS; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FINISHING; MATERIAL REMOVALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; OPTICAL LENSES; POLISHING TOOLS; PRESTON'S LAW; SOFTWARE TOOLS;

POLISHING;

EID: 50149085302     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2007.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. F.H. Zhang, G.W. Kang, Z.J. Qiu, S. Dong, Magnetorheological finishing of glass ceramic, in: Key Engineering Materials, vol. 257-258, 2004, pp. 511-514.
2. Kordonski W., and Golini D. Progress update in magnetorheological finishing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electro-Rheological Fluids (1998), World Scientific 837-844
3. Preston F.W. The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines. J. Soc. Glass Technol. 11 (1927) 214-256
4. Feng Z., Xuejun Z., and Jingchi Y. Mathematics model of magnetorheological finishing. Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technology 2000 vol. 4231 (2000), SPIE 490-497
5. Schinhaerl M., Pitschke E., Geiss A., Rascher R., Sperber P., Stamp R., Smith L., and Smith G. New viscosity measurement for magnetorheological polishing fluid. Optical Manufacturing and Testing VI vol. 5869 (2005), SPIE 133-141
6. Schinhaerl M., Pitschke E., Rascher R., Sperber P., Stamp R., Smith L., and Smith G. Temporal stability and performance of MR polishing fluid. Current Developments in Lens Design and Optical Engineering V vol. 5523 (2004), SPIE 273-280
7. Jha S., and Jain V. Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear 20 7-8 (2006) 856-866
8. Schinhaerl M., Pitschke E., Geiss A., Rascher R., Sperber P., Stamp R., Smith L., and Smith G. Comparison of different magnetorheological polishing fluids. Optical Fabrication, Testing, and Metrology II vol. 5965 (2005), SPIE 659-670
9. Lambropoulos J., Yang F., and Jacobs S.D. Toward a mechanical mechanism for material removal in magnetorheological finishing. Optical Fabrication and Testing vol. 7 (1996), Optical Society of America 150-153
10. QED technologies Q22-x Manual, www.qedmrf.com.