CODES: An integrated approach to composable modeling and simulation

Proceedings - Simulation Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 103-110

  Teo, Yong Meng ^a   Szabo, Claudia ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (STANDARDS); CODES (SYMBOLS); FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION THEORY; INTEGRATED CONTROL; LINGUISTICS; MARKUP LANGUAGES; ONTOLOGY; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS; SYNTACTICS;

ALIGNMENT ALGORITHMS; ANNUAL SIMULATION; APPLICATION DOMAINS; BLACK BOXES; COMPONENT-BASED MODELING; COMPONENT-ORIENTED; COMPOSABILITY; COMPOSABLE MODELING; DISCRETE EVENTS; IN COMPONENT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MODEL COMPONENTS; MODEL RE-USE; MULTIPLE APPLICATION DOMAINS; PROOF OF CONCEPTS; PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATIONS; QUEUEING SYSTEMS; SIMULATION AND MODELING; SIMULATION COMPONENTS; USER REQUIREMENTS; VALID SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION LANGUAGES;

EID: 50149083938     PISSN: 1080241X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ANSS-41.2008.24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. R. Bartholet, D. Brogan, P. Reynolds, and J. Carnahan. In Search of the Philosopher's Stone: Simulation Composability Versus Component-Based Software Design. In Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, USA, 2004.
2. R. Bartholet, D. Brogan, P. Reynolds, and J. Carnahan. The Computational Complexity of Component Selection in Simulation Reuse. In Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference, pages 2472-2481, Orlando, USA, 2005.
3. K. Breitman, M. Casanova, and W. Truszkowski. Semantic-Web: Concepts, Technologies and Applications. Springer Verlag, London, UK, 2007.
4. G. Chen and B. Szymanski. COST: A Component Oriented Discrete Event Simulator. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pages 776-782, San Diego, USA, 2002.
5. J. Cowie. Towards Realistic Million-Node Internet Simulations. In Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, pages 2129-2135, Las Vegas, USA, 1999.
6. B. Delinchant, F. Wurtz, D. Magot, and L. Gerbaud. A Component-Based Framework for the Composition of Simulation Software Modeling Electrical Systems. Simulation, 80:347-356, 2004.
7. Jena - A Semantic Web Framework for Java. http://jena.sourceforge.net, 2002.
8. S. Kasputis and H. Ng. Composable Simulations. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pages 1577-1584, Orlando, USA, 2000.
9. J. Miller and P. Fishwick. Ontologies for Modelling and Simulation: Issues and Approaches. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pages 259-264, Orlando, USA, 2004.
10. M. Petty and E. Weisel. Basis for a Theory of Semantic Composability. In Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, USA, 2003.
11. G. Silver, O. A.-H. Hassan, and J. Miller. From Domain On-tologies to Modeling Ontologies to Executable Simulation Models. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, page (to appear), Washington, USA, 2007.
12. G. A. Silver, L. Lacy, and J. A. Miller. Ontology Based Representations of Simulation Models Following the Process Interaction World View. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pages 1168 - 1176, Monterey, USA, 2006.
13. E. Sirin, B. Parsia, B. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz. Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics, 5:51-53, 2007.
14. C. Szabo and Y. Teo. On Syntactic Composability and Model Reuse. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling and Simulation, pages 230-237, Phuket, Thailand, 2007.
15. A. Tolk. What Comes After the Semantic Web - PADS Implications for the Dynamic Web. In Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation, pages 55-62, Singapore, 2006.