Life after death: An investigation into how mortality perceptions influence fertility preferences using evidence from an internet-based experiment

Journal of Evolutionary Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 155-172

  Mathews, Paul ^a   Sear, Rebecca ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fertility preferences; Life history theory; Online experiment; Terror management theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 50049135368     PISSN: 17892082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/JEP.6.2008.3.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Becker, E. (1973): The Denial of Death. New York: The Free Press: Macmillan.
2. Becker, G. S. (1991): A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
3. Berrington, A. (2004): Perpetual postponers? Women's, men's and couple's fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends, 117, 9-19.
4. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1991): Human behavioural ecology. In: Krebs, J., Davies, N. (eds): Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 69-98.
5. Caldwell, J.C. (1982): Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press.
6. Casterline, J. (2003): Demographic transition. In: Demeny, P., G. Mcnicoll (eds): Encyclopedia of Population, New York: Macmillan Reference, pp. 210-216.
7. Cleland, J. (2001): The effects of improved survival on fertility: A reassessment. Population and Development Review, 27, 60-92.
8. Cleland, J. & Wilson, C. (1987): Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41, 5-30.
9. Cohan, C. L. & Cole, S. W. (2002): Life course transitions and natural disaster: Marriage, birth & divorce following Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 14-25.
10. Davis, K. (1963): The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29, 345-366.
11. Freedman, R. (1997): Do family planning programs affect fertility preferences? A literature review. Studies in Family Planning, 28, 1-13.
12. Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Fischer, P., Koranyi, N., Berger, N. & Fleischmann, B. (2007): Mortality salience and the desire for offspring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 753-762.
13. Guz, D. & Hobcraft, J. (1991): Breastfeeding and fertility: a comparative analysis. Population Studies, 45, 91-108.
14. Heuveline, P. & B. Poch (2007): The phoenix population: Demographic crisis and rebound in Cambodia. Demography, 44, 405-426.
15. Knutsen, T. (2003): Why is Mathus' essay a classic? In: Jensen, A., Knutsen, T.L., Skonhoft, A. (eds): Visiting Malthus: The Man, his Times, the Issues. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag, pp. 21-43
16. Kohler, H. P., Behrman, J.R. & Skytthe, A. (2005): Partner plus children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Population and Development Review, 31, 407-446.
17. Laland, K. N. & Brown, G.R. (2002): Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Landau, M. J., Sheldon, S., Pyszczynski, T. & Greenberg, J. (2007): On the compatibility of Terror Management Theory and Perspectives on Human Evolution. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 476-519.
19. Mace, R. & Sear, R. (2005): Are humans cooperative breeders? In: Voland, E., Chasiotis, E. A., Schienfenhoevel, A. (eds): Grandmotherhood - the Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press, pp. 143-159.
20. McDonald, P. (2000): Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26, 427-439.
21. Montgomery, M.R. (2000): Perceiving mortality decline. Population and Development Review, 26, 795-819.
22. MSNBC (2006): Relationships and family reevaluated after 9/11. We asked readers tell how their lives were changed by Sept. 11 and its aftermath. Here, in their own words, are some of their stories. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/ 14587960, accessed 01/04/2007.
23. Navarrete, D.C. & Fessler, D.M.T. (2005): Normative bias and adaptive challenges: A relational approach to coalitional psychology and a critique of terror management theory. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 297-325.
24. Newson, L., Postmes, T., Lea, S.E.G. & Webley, P. (2005): Why are modern families small? Toward an evolutionary and cultural explanation for the demographic transition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 360-375.
25. Ni Bhrolchain, M. & Dyson, T. (2007): On causation in demography: Issues and illustrations. Population and Development Review, 33, 1-36.
26. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J. & Solomon, S. (1997): Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 1-20.
27. Ratcliffe, A.A., Hill, A.G. & Walraven, G. (2000): Separate lives, different interests: Male and female reproduction in the Gambia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 570-579.
28. Rodgers, J.L., Craig, A.S.J. & Coleman, R. (2005): Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma city bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma 1990-1999. Demography, 42, 675-692.
29. Ronsmans, C. (1996): Birth spacing and child survival in rural Senegal. International Journal of Epidemiology, 25, 989-997.
30. Smallwood, S. & Jefferies, J. (2003): Family building intentions in England and Wales: Trends, outcomes and interpretations. Population Trends, 112, 15-28.
31. Smith, E.A. & Winterhalder, B. (1992): Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behaviour. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
32. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. & Pyszczynski, T. (1991): A terror management theory of social behaviour: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 93-159.
33. Stearns, S.C. (2000): Life history evolution: Successes, limitations & prospects. Naturwissenschaften, 87, 476-486.
34. Wells, J.C.K. & Stock, J.T. (2007): The biology of the colonizing ape. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 134, 191-222.
35. Wisman, A. & Goldenberg, J. (2005): From grave to the cradle: Evidence that mortality salience engenders a desire for offspring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 46-61.