Abstracts of research articles: Reader's expectations and guidelines for authors

European Science Editing

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 63-65

  Ufnalska, Sylwia B ^a  

^a NONE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50049113685     PISSN: 02583127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Weiner J. Technika pisania i prezentowania przyrodniczych prac naukowych. Przewodnik praktyczny. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN, 2003.
2. O'Connor M. Writing successfully in science. London: Harper and Collins Academic, 1991.
3. Council of Science Editors, Style Manual Committee. Scientific style and format: the CSE manual for authors, editors, and publishers. 7th ed. Reston, VA: The Council, 2006.
4. Duszak A. Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics 1994;21:291-313.
5. Bhatia VK. Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman, 1993.
6. Swales JM. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
7. Graetz N. Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In: Ulijn JM, Pugh AK, eds. Reading for personal purposes. Leuven: Acco, 1985.
8. Hinds J. Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In: Connor U, Kaplan RB, eds. Writing across languages: analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1997:141-152.
9. Hinds J. Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Thai. In: Connor U, Kaplan RB, eds. Coherence: research and pedagogical perspectives. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1990:87-110.
10. Gopen GD, Swan JA. The science of scientific writing: If the reader is to grasp what the writer means, the writer must understand what the reader needs. American Scientist 1990;78(6):550-558.