Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: First experimental trial;Fluoroskopische navigation versus konventionelle manuelle positionierung der femurkomponente beim oberflächenersatz der hüfte: Erste experimentelle erprobung

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 204-212

  Gravius, Sascha ^a   Belei, Peter ^b   De La Fuente, Matias ^b   Müller Rath, Ralf ^c   Radermacher, Klaus ^b   Christian Wirtz, Dieter ^a   Mumme, Torsten ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cadaver study; Fluoroscopy; Hip resurfacing; Navigation

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; FLUORESCENT SCREENS; HIP PROSTHESES; INSTRUMENTS; METALS; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; PROSTHETICS;

ARTHROPLASTY; CADAVER STUDY; CLINICAL STUDIES; CLINICAL WORK FLOW; COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMORAL COMPONENTS; FEMORAL HEADS; FEMORAL NECKS; FLUOROSCOPIC NAVIGATION; FLUOROSCOPY; GERMANY; HIGH-ACCURACY; HIP RESURFACING; IMPLANT FAILURES; IN VITRO STUDIES; MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT; METAL-ON-METAL; MODULE LIBRARIES; NAVIGATION CONTROLS; OFFSET ERRORS; RANGE OF MOTION;

NAVIGATION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR SHAFT; FLUOROSCOPY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ORTHOPEDIC MANIPULATION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 50049107331     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2008.026     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004; 86: 28-39.
2. Beaulé PE, Campbell PA, Hoke R, Dorey F. Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. A vascular study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006; 88: 35-39.
3. Beaulé PE, Dorey F, Le Duff M, Gruen T, Amstutz H. Risk factors affecting early outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty on the hip in patients 40 years old and younger. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004; 418: 87-93.
4. Belei P, Skwara A, de la Fuente M, et al. Fluoroscopic navigation system for hip surface replacement. Comput Aid Surg 2007; 12: 160-167.
5. Claes L, Wilke HJ, Faiss S, Gerngross H. Biomechanische und morphologische Untersuchungen zu den Versagensursachen von Gelenkflä chenersatzprothesen. In: Schneider E (Hrsg.) Biomechanik des menschlichen Bewegungsapparates. Berlin: Springer 1997: 42-51.
6. Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty, Waddell JP, Schemitsch. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of femoral component of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89: 557-560.
7. de la Fuente M, Belei P, Ohnsorge J, Skwara A, Radermacher K. Zero-dose C-arm navigation: an efficient approach based on virtual X-ray targeting. Int J CARS 2 2007; (Suppl 1): 249-250.
8. de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993; 112: 220-225.
9. Freeman MAR. The complications of double-cup replacement of the hip. In: Ling RSM (Hrsg). Complications of total hip replacement. C. Livingstone Edinburgh 1994: 172-200.
10. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Gill TJ, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000; 82: 679-683.
11. Gebhard J, Belei P, Follmann A, de la Fuente M, Mumme T, Radermacher K. Minimal-invasive Referenzkörperhalterung für den computergestü tzten Hüftkopf-Oberflächenersatz. Proceedings BMT 2007 (Biomed Tech 52, Ergänzungsband/CD-ROM): Poster Nr. 50395.
12. Gravius S, Belei P, de la Fuente M, et al. Funktionalität und Genauigkeit eines fluoroskopie-basierten Navigationssystems zur Implantation von Hüftkopf-Oberflächenersatzprothesen: Anatomiestudie im Rahmen des "OrthoMIT"-Projektes. Z Orthop Unfall 2008; 146: 357-363.
13. Gravius S, Wirtz DC, Maus U, Andereya S, Müller-Rath R, Mumme T. Durom™-Hip-Oberflächenersatz am Hüftgelenk: erste klinische Ergebnisse mit dem lateralen Zugang. Z Orthop Unfall 2007; 145: 461-467.
14. Hess T, Gampe T, Köttgen C, Szawlowski B. Einsatz der Navigation beim Oberflächenersatz des Hüftgelenks. Methodik und erste Ergebnisse. Orthopäde 2004; 33: 1183-1193.
15. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte LP. Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aid Surg 1999; 4: 65-76.
16. Howie DW, Cornish BL, Vernon-Roberts B. Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: classification of loosening and the role of prosthetic wear particles. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990; 255: 144-159.
17. Knecht A, Witzleb WC, Günther KP. Oberflächenersatz am Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde 2005; 34: 79-90.
18. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1996; (Suppl): 89-98.
19. McMinn DJW. The development of the metal-metal hip resurfacing. Hip international 2003; 13 (S-2): 41-53.
20. Schmalzried TP, Fowble VA, Ure KJ, Amstutz HC. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Technique, fixation and early results. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1996; 329: 106-114.
21. Steffen RT, Smith SR, Urban JP, et al. The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87: 1468-1474.
22. Wirth CJ, Gosse F. Verbesserte Implantationstechnik der Oberflächenendoprothese des Hüftgelenkes. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2006; 18: 214-224.
23. Zimolong A, Portheine F, Friedrichs D, Traub F, Radermacher K. Evaluation of deformable models for femoral neck surgery. J Comput Aided Surg 2004; 9: 71-79.